Close
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: NRA giving in?

  1. #21
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,470
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mtnhack View Post
    Did I miss where the NRA was out here fighting for our Colorado rights? IMO they were negligently missing from the action.

    They were here. Were you?
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  2. #22
    Gourmet Catfood Connoisseur StagLefty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mtnhack View Post
    Did I miss where the NRA was out here fighting for our Colorado rights? IMO they were negligently missing from the action.
    I believe they had a rep testify at the Capitol recently.
    Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to Fight, he'll just kill you.

  3. #23
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milliken, CO
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foxtrot View Post
    I agree with the general sentiment. - this is not appropriate.

    On that note though, there is one massive long term problem with the NRA.

    Problem #1: Generally speaking, they get more money if there is "gun control". They stop existing if the problem is permanently resolved. While they are certainly a positive organization, they are an organization that will never (unless forced) take any action towards permanently and forever resolving it.They have a history of wanting to avoid SCOTUS rulings or any amendments. NRA didn't want DC. vs. Heller they initially worked against it - when they realized it was happening with or without them, they finally jumped on board for the drive.

    With the above holdings, they are beneficial to our cause in the short term. But someday, I'd like to see an organization more dedicated to long-term solutions take rise. Won't ever see it.

    Problem is, there is always a next fight right now, and it only gets harder. NRA is great in the moment, but a lot of people's sole reliance upon it will likely ultimately doom the 2A many many years in the future.

    Note: This is not me agreeing with Dudley in any way. I am supportive of the NRA, they fight, I just know they won't "fix" anything.
    While I generally agree, if you really look at it, the 2nd Amendment, was intended to be the "fix", it's just being ignored, and that will never change. The reason we have the NRA (in it's current form) is because of trying to undo the fix to begin with. I don't see the NRA actively ginning up fights against us, when times were better, they were actively working to try and push the boulder back up the hill with shall issue, and right to carry bills around the country where there was any possibility of passing them. It's not like they sat on their heals.

    However it's pretty obvious when fair weather gun owners see fit to only support the NRA when their rights are threatened. Hence the record numbers of life memberships, and new memberships happening now, like in 08, and other recent swings. If people made it a priority all of the time to continue to fight for it, the NRA wouldn't see huge influx when rights are in immanent threat.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •