I figured out the pace by checking it out every few minutes and then dividing by however many seconds it was since the last time I refreshed.
I figured out the pace by checking it out every few minutes and then dividing by however many seconds it was since the last time I refreshed.
"IF" you are voting multiple times please use a VPN to change your IP address. Otherwise they will call this a rigged poll because one guy from one IP address voted 3K times,I can picture them saying that to discredit gun owners. Just don't give them the ammo to shoot back at us.
I have been monitoring it also and the against are about 3-1 to the fors continuously. I refreshed it 8 times and it was consistently more against than for, and the undecided moved 1 vote that entire time. Something is fishy here.
I saw this happen too. We were at 81%, and then i just saw it wind down, in a matter of minutes, down to 75%. It's still sinking *by the second*. 300 "against overturn" votes in 30 seconds. The script for them to do this would be very easy to do. I would like to think we could stay on top without resorting to dirty tricks, though.... (As I typed this last line, 'against overturn' gained 47 votes.)
One thing to understand here. If this kind of business is going on, then we can bet that thousands of emails went to Hick in the same way.
Last edited by aryntha; 03-15-2013 at 12:57.
I will say the progressive readers are DPO come out in spurts. Want to make your eyes bleed read the comments on some of the articles. It will go for pages with common sense people in the am and then come afternoon the progressives come out the comments turn against, almost like clockwork.
Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.
If that's true, 100+ of them are coming out a minute. Take a look for yourself. This began in earnest about an hour ago; we were in the 80-81% range since late last night. Still sinking by the second.
Somebody is definitely cheatin' for the libs.
This could be one hipster kid in an IT department doing this. DP may be none the wiser. Course if we were to do it, it'd be reported that the "EVIL GUN LOBBY USES CYBER WARFARE TO SWAY somethingsomething."
Who really fucking cares if it's one person? We've got people on this board suggesting how you can vote multiple times.
And the opposition to the initiative is still massively outnumbered.