Quote Originally Posted by Circuits View Post
In which case they would run newly afoul of the 2003 state pre-emption law, subject to a new lawsuit by either the state or an interested party. While Denver's ban remains the same, they get to keep their deadlock COSC/affirmative lower court ruling. A new change to either the state pre-emption law, or to Denver's statute would make the issue ripe for a revisit.

TFogger: The state pre-emption law actually does prevent localities from being more restrictive than the state as regards firearms. Denver won an issue-specific ruling on their home-rule AW ban, not a general exemption.

My $0.02 at least.
Not just Denver. Vail also has the same 20 round restriction on their books. I don't know if they enforce it as vigorously though (as if Denver enforces it vigorously at all).