Hickenlooper's video message on Gun Control

[Great-Kazoo]

What lying sack of shit.

I am also so very tired of the blatant lie that is "illegal guns with no background check are just a mouse click away." fucking lying fuck twit douche nozzle.

It's not that he is lying, but people believe it. That is and should be the real concern.

[stevelkinevil]

I tried, I got about 8 seconds in before I couldn't take anymore. It was absurd and more than a little hard to believe that this was the governor of CO and not some left coast shithole.

[buffalobo]

Glad to know that in Amerika it only takes a little "common sense" to throw out freedom.

[BREATHER]

Why is he grinning like a poofter

[BREATHER]

Again, when you keep the retards in this state drunk and high any piece of shit politician can do anything.....Have you seen the fucks out there smoking weed. ??? I really don't have anything against weed, but there are a whole lot of assmonkeys out there using their government given welfare, food stamps, SSI and SSDI on weed. Thye want to do drugs, lets these POS's get a fucking job....I am tired of these politicians using liberal drug and alchohol policies to buy votes.....

[BlueDog]

once again.

"i dont mind jumping through hoops to use the rights afforded me by the Bill of Rights" what is wrong with you liberal tainted people?



either the second amendment is infringed or its not. i guess in your world its ok if its infringed, just as long as you are ok, how its infringed.

Fudd 1 " i dont care i they take away evil black rifles, i shoot a shotgun"
Fudd 2 " i dont care if they take away shotguns, I shoot a lever action rifle"
Fudd 3 " i dont mind doing background checks, just as long as there is no registration"
Fudd 4 " i dont mind registration if it saves one life"
Fudd 5 " i dont mind if they take away all our guns, they are only meant for killing, i now know I was wrong to own one in the past"

I don't have a problem with it because I already do background checks on person to person transfers to cover my own ass, that doesn't mean I think it should be law for everyone and nowhere in that post did I make that statement. I don't like the law, I don't want the law, I was merely asking for some clarification on the part of it that I thought would impact me the most. Sorry if I did not make that clear enough, but I fought against every single one of their measures, so how about not jumping to conclusions and calling me a liberally tainted fudd just because I asked a question...

[Mtn.man]

Why is he grinning like a poofter

Grandpaw always said "beware of some one who grins all the time, they are up too no good".

[jslo]

I don't have a problem with it because I already do background checks on person to person transfers to cover my own ass, that doesn't mean I think it should be law for everyone and nowhere in that post did I make that statement. I don't like the law, I don't want the law, I was merely asking for some clarification on the part of it that I thought would impact me the most. Sorry if I did not make that clear enough, but I fought against every single one of their measures, so how about not jumping to conclusions and calling me a liberally tainted fudd just because I asked a question...

Contradictory and confusing

[BlueDog]

Contradictory and confusing

Which part? Lets see if I can make it more clear. The "it" in that post refers to doing background checks on private party sales, not the law making it a requirement for everyone. I don't personally have a problem with doing background checks on private party sales because I already do it. This does not mean I think there should be a law mandating this as a requirement, and nowhere did I say that.

This would be similar to I don't have a problem with wearing my seat belt, or my helmet while riding the motorcycle because I already do these things. But I don't think there should ever be a law mandating that everyone has to. My original post was not meant to make any excuses for this law or meant to infer in any way that I support it. I was merely asking a question about this law, that has unfortunately been signed and will hopefully be overturned, to get some clarification about the part that will affect me the most personally until it is overturned.

[Irving]

By you saying that it doesn't bother you, because you already do it, leads members to believe that it would also make you complacent during these bills and not actively fight against them. That is the gap between what you've said, and what you meant. It is a natural assumption that if something changes that does not affect you, you would not go out of your way to fight against it.