Quote Originally Posted by jslo View Post
Contradictory and confusing
Which part? Lets see if I can make it more clear. The "it" in that post refers to doing background checks on private party sales, not the law making it a requirement for everyone. I don't personally have a problem with doing background checks on private party sales because I already do it. This does not mean I think there should be a law mandating this as a requirement, and nowhere did I say that.

This would be similar to I don't have a problem with wearing my seat belt, or my helmet while riding the motorcycle because I already do these things. But I don't think there should ever be a law mandating that everyone has to. My original post was not meant to make any excuses for this law or meant to infer in any way that I support it. I was merely asking a question about this law, that has unfortunately been signed and will hopefully be overturned, to get some clarification about the part that will affect me the most personally until it is overturned.