Hey chucklehead...

[netsecsys]

I am pretty sure I was not defending the original douche...

[USAFGopherMike]

Has anyone else noticed how 90% of the alleged "former SF" or "former SEAL" dbs you meet lipping off to random people in bars all are well under .mil retirement age with no apparent disability, pale babyface, out of shape, dishwater IQ, and at least 100# overweight?

those that can't....lie.

[Monky]

I think you missed the point...

I'd say that yes.. yes he did.

I am surprised by some of you that seem to be defending this guy. I am pretty sure most of you were all pretty opposed to the guys that decided to "open carry" thier rifles to Walmart and the mall. Same/same, it makes all of us look like chuckleheads.

I think it's pretty hilarious some of the responses. It's why I have attempted to NOT respond. None of us wanted anything more than to tell the chucklehead to STFU, the situation as Rob pointed out would probably not have gone well from there. But please.. if anyone knows him I'd love to chat with him when he's sober. Hell I'd even buy him a burger

As to if Rob throws out all fat people.. No he does not.

[Great-Kazoo]

Wow, you sound like a dick... Do you throw fat people out of your establishment and not serve them?

I've thrown DRUNKS of all weight classes out and they knew they weren't getting served.

[netsecsys]

No doubt the dude was a douche. Thinking pulling the guy aside and explaining that he is really giving the 2nd amendment a bad name and hurting the cause would be more constructive than keyboard commando trashing someone (do not know the guy btw)?

Balls enough to go off on someone and their looks on the internet vs actually making a positive out of a negative..not so heroic for the cause..just sayin

[spittoon]

Kinda looks like your avatar.

this

[Monky]

No doubt the dude was a douche. Thinking pulling the guy aside and explaining that he is really giving the 2nd amendment a bad name and hurting the cause would be more constructive than keyboard commando trashing someone (do not know the guy btw)?

Balls enough to go off on someone and their looks on the internet vs actually making a positive out of a negative..not so heroic for the cause..just sayin

Perhaps you have missed the three of us there who have stated clearly that it would have escalated beyond a friendly chat. I have no problem telling people to fuck off outside of the Internet.

I will however exercise my ability to avoid violence even though I am more than capable armed or not to defend myself.

Please though tell me how to take a table full of drunk asshats and have a civil conversation.


Sent by a free-range electronic weasel, with no sense of personal space.

[FireMoth]

Im a dick? Thanks for keeping up.

Its sad that there are people who have latched onto, amongst the myriad of adjectives, the fact that the offending party was rather corpulent. I also mentioned that he was a disgusting, handsy, drunken idiot, etc.
If he had been a gym rat meat head, Id have mentioned that as well.

Heres reality: We are visual creatures. EVERYBODY JUDGES ON APPEARANCE. Everyone in that establishment was LOOKING< then shaking their heads in offense at this person. So their appearance, combined with their behavior, served to convey a fairly unfortunate image of gun owners.

Had the offending party been fit, well kempt, and handsome, he probably would have been passed of simply as drunk. Just like you'll hit on the obnoxious drunk HOT girl, but be repulsed by her fat friend

So, I will continue to identify negative, visually apparent traits, because they are relevant to the argument.

If you are self conscious about your level of fitness, or appearance, I suggest you bathe more, and do a lot of 8 count body builders.

Because, honestly, Im a DICK

[Great-Kazoo]

No doubt the dude was a douche. Thinking pulling the guy aside and explaining that he is really giving the 2nd amendment a bad name and hurting the cause would be more constructive than keyboard commando trashing someone (do not know the guy btw)?

Balls enough to go off on someone and their looks on the internet vs actually making a positive out of a negative..not so heroic for the cause..just sayin

You must drink in bars where the drunks are hipsters or metrosexuals. We've all (well looks like not all of us) have seen drunks pound the shit out of their drinking buddies, let alone some nosy, sweet poly purebread.

[Teufelhund]

I'm not going to defend nor rebuke the idiot in question for the way he was acting/looking/smelling, because I wasn't there, and honestly I just don't care.

I think one of the worst problems we have in this society is caring too much what other individuals think, how they act, and how it may reflect on us. There will always be people who are perceived as socially unacceptable, and yes, sometimes they will share some of the same views I do. There isn't anything I can do about it, and I just don't think it's my right to make someone behave the way I want them to, just so others don't think poorly of me.

There is nothing anyone can do to take away your rights. A 200 year old piece of paper does not grant your right to think, or to speak, or to defend yourself. If you are alone at the table, and all the rest of us rise up and vote that you cannot think your thoughts, that does not make it so. Your other inalienable rights are exactly that - they cannot be removed from you by anyone or anything; they are inherent to the condition of being human. I think this is the message more worthy of spreading, and not whether or not everyone should act a certain way, in hopes that you may be allowed to keep something which cannot be taken from you.