Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
There you go ... finally found the answer. I have no idea how you ever came to a conclusion that they were "wavering" from a statement that was issued early in the fight and that simply said they were trying to find a way to serve LEOs who were doing their duty to the Constitution. The whole OP and subsequent defenses of it were one massive failure in reading comprehension.
Last comment. I don't consider March 1st to be "early in the fight" but understandable. After all they had a business to run and were taking the time to prepare and testify. Also the thread started as a question, hence the ?, and was meant to get others thoughts on their statement. It seemed to me they were considering a "promise" would be adequate to resume sales. We know who some of the "good" guys are and who some of the "bad" guys are. A promise from the ones that actively fought "us", IMO, is not good enough. I'll take a step back and watch how MagPul decides to handle it. Don't get me wrong, I support and appreciate everything they have done, so far.