Here are some thoughts on the whole issue- both the "same sex" and 2A issues...
"civil union, or matrimonial contract, as recognized by the state, whereas "marriage" is a religious term. So technically, yes, I'm against someone stepping in and forcing those who's beliefs are contrary to accepting a definition that they do not agree with. I'm all for same sex couples' union being recognized by the state and given the same legal protection and rights. However, when one decrees that being against "same sex equality" is wrong, who are you to judge? Maybe that is that person's individual beliefs, and they are entitled to it." -In response to a liberal asking for clarification on my stance.
"I'm posting this not in opposition of "marriage equality" which is a leading/loaded phrase (gov't has no business being involved in "marriage"- the word you're looking for is Civil Union or contract recognized by the state), but I posted this pic to outline the grave hypocrisy of one group crying for "equal" rights, yet many of it's members are also calling for the restriction of other rights, rights that just so happen to be outlined and defended by our Constitution (marriage, or civil union for that matter is not mentioned or outlined anywhere in the Constitution or Bill of Rights, just FYI)." -Explaining to a lesbian friend about the equal AR pic.
"So, those who support gay marriage equality, are you also a hypocrite who also supports the infringement of 2nd Amendment rights?" -Status posted with an obviously loaded/leading question about the duality of the issue and the only reason I would have a problem with these people ("We want our rights, but to hell with yours").