I just want to make sure I understand what you are saying before I formulate a response. Are you saying instead of giving gay couples the same perks/benefits as straight couples (civil unions for all would do that)... you would rather get rid of perks/benefits all together for ALL couples because now we have created a class differentiation between couples and singles? It doesn't matter if they are hetero or gay... but now we are discriminating against those who aren't in a relationship... that is your issue? IF that is your issue (and I don't want to put words in your mouth... I just want to make sure I understand you) then you would be against grants for college students (because it drives a wedge between the class of people who want to be educated and those who don't), you would be against home subsidies (because it drives a wedge between those who rent and those who buy), you would be against farm subsidies because there are people who work in an office instead of a farm, and you would be against tax breaks for small businesses because there are people out there who don't own a business? I could be wrong, but that kind of sounds like what you are saying.