Close
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Varmiteer hammer03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    512

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    Actually, the problem is that she doesn't think, she feels and mistakes that for thinking.
    Agreed. I think it's pretty clear that the exception was included to allow security for schools. Who cares if that person also happens to already be on the payroll, serves another purpose, AND doesn't cost the taxpayers anything extra? Win win win?

  2. #12
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    N.W. Denver
    Posts
    1,416

    Default

    If she has the stance that security isn't allowed to be armed (which is allowed by law) then she should also hold that police shouldn't be allowed to have weapons on school property either.
    If you want peace, prepare for war.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •