I still say the correct course of action is to feed this animal feet first into a wood chipper. Nobody doubts that he did the crime. Whether or not he's insane is a moot point: By definition, he'd have to be crazy to do this. Insanity doesn't make him any less guilty, and it shouldn't make him any less responsible. A dog doesn't have to kill someone to be put to death, it just has to injure someone and show a propensity for doing it again. This criminal has shown that he has an understanding of the crime, and can participate in his own defense. A life sentence without parole is a mockery of justice. Why should he be allowed to live another 50 or 60 years at our expense, after deliberately and with premeditation taking 14 lives, with the intent of taking many more?