Close
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Legislators at it again

    Here we go again, this sounds bad. http://m.9news.com/topstory/article?a=328535&f=1272

  2. #2
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Posts
    1,959

    Default

    Wouldn't reporting anyone to CBI be a violation of federal medical privacy laws?

  3. #3
    Gong Shooter MAP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Windsor, CO
    Posts
    425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric P View Post
    Wouldn't reporting anyone to CBI be a violation of federal medical privacy laws?
    The version I read only requires the name of the person be given to CBI. This is ripe for abuse.

    Mike

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MAP View Post
    The version I read only requires the name of the person be given to CBI. This is ripe for abuse.

    Mike
    I do work quite a bit in suicide and threat assessments regarding K-12 young people. Sometimes I do ask law enforcement to do to welfare and safety checks on young people who are threat to themselves or others. Currently these checks save lives, but do not violate the constitutional rights of the families because the 2nd and 4th amendment rights are recognized by law enforcement. However what if the 4th was disregarded as this law could set up?

    Personally I am quite worried about the power that such a law would give to potential anti gun people. My wife is a psychologist and I often read the learning material that was provided to her or that was mandated that she research to obtain her degree and certifications. Quite frankly I have noticed many instances where there was a lot of biased material against gun ownership in much of the material. My wife and I are strong 2nd amendment supporters, however many of the others who are exposed to this material as they obtain these degrees and certifications may come out quite biased and anti 2nd amendment. I worry about how these people would utilize such power.

  5. #5

    Default

    My problem with it? Who makes the decision? Some libereal educated mental health worker? I

  6. #6
    Varmiteer scratchy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Broomfield
    Posts
    743

    Default

    I keep hoping I'll wake up and it will be April 2.

  7. #7
    Mr. Engrish
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Castle Rock
    Posts
    1,590

    Default

    People who vote wrong should be entered into a database of non-voters. Ie damnocrats.

    I'm an RN - I'd be happy to make that call for them.

  8. #8
    Retired Admin
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    12,932

    Default Legislators at it again

    Quote Originally Posted by battle_sight_zero View Post
    My problem with it? Who makes the decision? Some libereal educated mental health worker? I
    ^This


    Sent from my Otterbox Defended Tactical iPhone using High Capacity "Clips".

  9. #9
    Plainsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    colorado springs
    Posts
    3,438

    Default

    holy shit this states reps suck a nut i cant wait for 2014

  10. #10
    Mr. Engrish
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Castle Rock
    Posts
    1,590

    Default

    If you guys think they're stopping at mag limits and UBC's, you're nuts. That was just the tip of the damnocratic-controlled iceberg. They're a runaway train that just keeps gathering steam. I'm past the point where I'm dismayed or surprised by any new legislative horror - I've made peace with it. I will treat all of the new laws with all the of the respect and creedence they deserve. And will continue to follow and observe them in the same way I have all along.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •