Here's a link to a very interesting survey of LEOs.
http://www.policeone.com/Gun-Legisla...cers-thoughts/
Here's a link to a very interesting survey of LEOs.
http://www.policeone.com/Gun-Legisla...cers-thoughts/
As long as demographics and geographical locations are heterogeneous, it is great!
But it does not fit the agenda..........
I see you running, tell me what your running from
Nobody's coming, what ya do that was so wrong.
"These are not the facts you're looking for, move along"
This needs to get on Drudge. How many times have Uncle Joe and Owebama gotten on stage and said that cops agree with them?? The respondents overwhelmingly said NO!!
http://www.policeone.com/Gun-Legisla...cers-thoughts/
This needs to get everywhere, DP to Drudge. Everywhere. I've submitted it to drudge on all of my computers.
http://disciplejourney.com
“Make men large and strong and tyranny will bankrupt itself in making shackles for them.” – Rev. Henry Ward Beecher (1813-1887) US Abolitionist Preacher
CIPCIP
Holy shit.... the previous one was only three links below this one. I'm not a repost nazi, but damn.....
Whoops
I liked the responses from the police officers, except the question about whether or not training should be required before owning a gun. Obviously half of police officers don't understand "shall not be infringed". Infringed meaning "interfered with in any way".
yeah, I understand how it makes sense that training would help prevent accidents. But that's not what the 2nd amendment says.
it tells me that half the police officers want to interpret the 2nd amendment in some other way than it was written.