Close
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Paper Hunter polski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    161

    Default mag ban legal analysis

    Some good analysis of the mag ban here by an Co Springs attorney. Anybody know much about him?

    http://www.survivalblog.com/2013/04/...-j-priebe.html

  2. #2
    At least my tag is unmolested
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    CANON CITY, CO
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    He's made a couple of misreadings of the bill text that I've spotted just at the first reading. For instance, .22 rimfire magazines are included contrary to his statement. The exception is for "AN ATTACHED TUBULAR DEVICE DESIGNED TO ACCEPT, AND CAPABLE OF OPERATING ONLY WITH, .22CALIBER RIMFIRE AMMUNITION". Also his statement about lever action magazines is too broad, as again "tubular" magazines on a lever action are not included in the banned magazines (sure at the moment, I can't think of a lever action other than the 1895 without a tubular magazine).

    So be cautious of his analysis.
    Sayonara

  3. #3
    Paper Hunter polski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Yeah, his comment regarding the exception to .22 magazines surprised me as I had not heard that.

  4. #4
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,471
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Browning BLR rifles use DBMs.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  5. #5
    At least my tag is unmolested
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    CANON CITY, CO
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    Ah, good recollection, Bailey Guns. Thanks.
    Sayonara

  6. #6
    Just a little different buckshotbarlow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    littleton
    Posts
    1,866

    Default

    Well, at least we got 1 lawyer on this...and best point of the article is the recall effort!
    NRA BP+PPITH Instructor
    CO state senator: 2nd Amendment doesn't protect duck hunting, therefore:
    2 non web feet bad,
    2 web feet good...
    Vas-tly Different Now...and prefers corn to peas

  7. #7
    At least my tag is unmolested
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    CANON CITY, CO
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    No, we've had other lawyers on this. And as I pointed out, his article has errors.
    Sayonara

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •