I realize I'm probably soliciting opinions from the wrong crowd here, but how is the $10 BGC fee any different than a polling tax? Since the 2A guarantees our right to keep and bear arms (arguably, according to some politicians), isn't the fee a barrier to the exercise of our rights?

The courts have already determined that charging a fee to vote is unconstitutional. How is this any different?

I was wondering if there's a potential lawsuit here against the state but figured I'd float the idea here. Opinions on why this WOULDN'T be viable are more valuable than why it should.

And discuss...