PDA

View Full Version : Bengahzi gets thicker



BPTactical
08-13-2013, 07:02
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/08/12/Attorney-For-Benghazi-Whistleblower-400-U-S-Missiles-Stolen-In-Benghazi-Annex-Involved

On August 12, Joe DiGenova, attorney for one of the Benghazi whistleblowers, told Washington D.C.'s WMAL that one of the reasons people have remained tight-lipped about Benghazi is because 400 U.S. missiles were "diverted to Libya" and ended up being stolen and falling into "the hands of some very ugly people."
DiGenova represents Benghazi whistleblower Mark Thompson. He told WMAL that he "does not know whether [the missiles] were at the annex, but it is clear the annex was somehow involved in the distribution of those missiles."
He claimed his information "comes from a former intelligence official who stayed in constant contact with people in the special ops and intelligence community." He said the biggest concern right now is finding those missiles before they can be put to use. "They are worried, specifically according to these sources, about an attempt to shoot down an airliner," he claimed.
On August 4, Breitbart News covered a report in The Telegraph that said 35 CIA operatives were working in Benghazi when the attack against the consulate took place. The Telegraph claimed these operatives were allegedly in an "annex near the consulate [working] on a project to supply missiles from Libyan armories to Syrian Rebels."
Months earlier, following then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta's February 7 testimony on Capitol Hill about the Benghazi attacks, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) suggested that one of the causes behind the terrorist attack "may have been that there was a gun running operation going on in Benghazi, leaving Libya and going to Turkey and [distributing] arms to the [Syrian] rebels.

stoner01
08-13-2013, 07:05
Fast and Furious 2.0

BPTactical
08-13-2013, 07:10
Arms running was an early speculation on Becks show.
He was poo-pooed and ridiculed for stating such.
Closer to the bone, the sweeter the meat.

Mick-Boy
08-13-2013, 07:17
Ruh Roh Raggy!

stoner01
08-13-2013, 07:19
Oh and this will be sure reported in the news.

Great-Kazoo
08-13-2013, 07:27
I've had grass clippings stay on my shoes longer than this admin's scrutiny, by the MSM

7insert
08-13-2013, 09:54
Once again rand paul askes the hard questions

sellersm
08-13-2013, 10:00
This was brought up in another thread a while ago, perhaps in an article by Ronin? Not a lot of traction around here originally on this 'idea', but I think it has merit. Nothing surprises me...

And I'm too lazy to go look for the thread that had it in it...

Zundfolge
08-13-2013, 10:41
This has been my theory from the beginning.

Either it was an arms deal gone bad, or the Obama regime allowed Amb. Stephens to be murdered to keep him quiet about the fact that the regime has been arming the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Queda with heavy weapons for some time now.

Dave
08-13-2013, 11:43
Didn't you get the memo? We've moved on from Benghazi to Trayvon, then to the royal baby, and now Anthony Weiner. Or at least that's how CNN and MSNBC went.

mtnhack
08-13-2013, 12:06
This has been my theory from the beginning. Either it was an arms deal gone bad, or the Obama regime allowed Amb. Stephens to be murdered to keep him quiet about the fact that the regime has been arming the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Queda with heavy weapons for some time now.So now you are saying the administration took out (or arranged for) our own diplomat and 3 others to be murdered for a cover up? This seems far fetched to me. I would think the attack would have been better conceived if this were the case. Supposedly, he died of asphixiation; not the most assured method of assassination.


I am still unsure of what exactly this article is stating. Are they saying that the annex near the attacked consulate was raided during the attack and that is when the 400 missiles were stolen? If that is the case, it really does not make any sense as to why forces would have been withheld from fighting off the attack. This would have increased the liklihood of losing the missiles, and their existance and worse, origin eventually coming to light. If those missiles were in the annex and there were an attack, I would assume someone would have ordered an immense counter attack to ensure no one lived and none of those weapons made it out.

stoner01
08-13-2013, 12:15
Since when would the government do something based on logic.

hghclsswhitetrsh
08-13-2013, 12:34
Since when would the government do something based on logic.

They don't. And by the way it's called 'common sense measures', get with the times bro.

BPTactical
08-13-2013, 13:09
So now you are saying the administration took out (or arranged for) our own diplomat and 3 others to be murdered for a cover up? This seems far fetched to me.

I wholeheartedly would disagree.
Under whose authority was Stevens operating?
Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Can you say "Vince Foster"?

I would put nothing beyond these people.

mtnhack
08-13-2013, 13:17
I wholeheartedly would disagree. Under whose authority was Stevens operating? Hillary Rodham Clinton. Can you say "Vince Foster"? I would put nothing beyond these people.You took my quote out of context. I wouldn't be surprised to hear that one of our own was targeted, I would be surprised to hear that the methodology used at the Bengahzi consolate would be drawn up by our government for those purposes.

Zundfolge
08-13-2013, 13:22
Obama is acting as an agent of The Muslim Brotherhood (just who do you think Valerie Jarrett takes the orders she passes on to Barry from?).

Obama has been trying to strengthen and arm the Muslim Brotherhood for some time now (which is why he supported Morsi's rise in Egypt but did nothing to help the actual Democracy demonstrators in Iran).

So yes, I stand by my theories that either the attack was an arms deal gone bad (or one theory states that Stevens was there to get weapons back and the MB said FU) OR there is even the possibility that Obama had Stevens killed by the MB to keep him quiet. While I suspect it was probably the former, it would not surprise me if it was the latter.

As for Hillary's part in all this I have 2 words; Huma Wiener.


Yeah, that all sounds pretty far fetched, but when you look at the actions of this President and his Fellow Travelers I don't think you can chalk all of it up to stupidity or incompetence. It's only once you realize that Obama and his ilk are enemies of the United States and her Constitution and wish to see the utter destruction of both, do their actions make sense.

Aloha_Shooter
08-13-2013, 13:40
Didn't you get the memo? We've moved on from Benghazi to Trayvon, then to the royal baby, and now Anthony Weiner. Or at least that's how CNN and MSNBC went.

Not quite. CNN and MSNBC never bothered with Benghazi in the first place, considering it to just be right-wing noise. Their coverage has been more Travyon, mean Republicans, Trayvon, royal baby, Trayvon, mean racist Republicans, Trayvon ...

clublights
08-13-2013, 13:44
Wasn't there something recently about terrorists having hellfire missiles ?


I guess we now know where they came from ....

Edit

yeah here we are

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/08/05/us-made-hellfire-missile-believed-to-have-been-used-in-insurgent-attack-on/

buckeye4rnr
08-13-2013, 14:47
If you check the right places it's not even just about the missiles, JSOC was performing targeted killings that were MUCH more effective than a drone strike. The annex, from what I've read, was the base for some of the GRS guys who were out trying to recover the missiles but everyone who mattered over there was completely unaware of the JSOC forces that were kicking the hornets nest.

Tinelement
08-13-2013, 14:55
I wholeheartedly would disagree.
Under whose authority was Stevens operating?
Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Can you say "Vince Foster"?

I would put nothing beyond these people.


Obama has been trying to strengthen and arm the Muslim Brotherhood for some time now (which is why he supported Morsi's rise in Egypt but did nothing to help the actual Democracy demonstrators in Iran).


Agreed!!

roberth
08-13-2013, 16:36
This has been my theory from the beginning.

Either it was an arms deal gone bad, or the Obama regime allowed Amb. Stephens to be murdered to keep him quiet about the fact that the regime has been arming the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Queda with heavy weapons for some time now.

...and if the obama administration didn't have him murdered they most certainly allowed him to be murdered.

brokenscout
08-14-2013, 07:29
Arming these guys goes back to when they started.

Byte Stryke
08-14-2013, 08:04
get into bed with someone, the rules of the game change to an uncomfortable level, More people in bed doing things you don't like... deal with it, because you aren't getting out.