Log in

View Full Version : NY Judge Rules Against 7 Round Magazine Limit



Punkface
01-01-2014, 11:37
http://gunssavelives.net/blog/gun-laws/breaking-federal-judge-upholds-nys-unconstitutional-safe-act-but-rejects-7-round-magazine-limit/

Eric P
01-01-2014, 11:46
But upheld the other silliness. Not a win for gun ownership!!

Dave
01-01-2014, 11:54
Makes you wonder about other conservative appointed judges and how they will rule on similar cases.

BPTactical
01-01-2014, 12:07
But upheld the other silliness. Not a win for gun ownership!!

Yup.



Only hope is SCOTUS remembers Heller where a class of firearm may not be banned.

Rabid
01-01-2014, 12:10
He only rejected the part about 7 rounds being loaded in a 10 round magazine. They are still at a 10 round limit.
A lot more info in this article http://www.buffalonews.com/city-region/state/federal-judge-upholds-majority-of-safe-act-20131231

ChadAmberg
01-01-2014, 12:11
Between this and the NSA is allowed to put cameras in your toilet* because terrorists!!1!!1! ruling recently, it's been pretty sad.

* I know, a little hyperbole. But just wait...

Skip
01-01-2014, 12:12
But upheld the other silliness. Not a win for gun ownership!!

My thoughts as well.

I would like to see, for once, a judge with integrity decide these issues on the basis of black-letter law and not subjective policy.

This judge said that some limit was okay, but the seven round limit was not okay. Well... Then what is the limit according to law? How many rounds does it take before you cross the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED standard set by 2A?

Miller v. US settled this plain and simple. If a weapon was in common use, or used in the military, it was protected by 2A. 30 round standard cap AR mags are in common use and issued in the MIL. They are part of weapons system that determine the weapons capability and lethality. Making a weapon less lethal is an infringement.

Why can't Miller ever be part of the consideration?

Is it that acknowledging Miller means a judge would be acknowledging that 2A is actually about balancing the power of the government and has jack shit to do with hunting?

KAPA
01-01-2014, 22:03
M
How many rounds does it take before you cross the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED standard set by 2A?nting?

From listening to liberal anti-gun types in the past, they are convinced that as long as you have a single shot .22 and are only allowed to possess one bullet at a time, they are doing you and the 2A a huge favor. This is what people mean when they say they support 2A and then follow that up with "BUT"...

KevDen2005
01-02-2014, 01:43
Between this and the NSA is allowed to put cameras in your toilet* because terrorists!!1!!1! ruling recently, it's been pretty sad.

* I know, a little hyperbole. But just wait...

The NSA would be very upset and sad if they put a camera in my toilet. I make toilets cry.

Irving
01-02-2014, 01:48
The NSA would be very upset and sad if they put a camera in my toilet. I make toilets cry.

I guess it depends what they are into...

KevDen2005
01-02-2014, 01:50
I guess it depends what they are into...


In that case I welcome them to the show,

I feel dirty

Irving
01-02-2014, 02:02
I bet the NSA has the best voyeur cam porn in the world!

GilpinGuy
01-02-2014, 02:15
A camera on cray's toilet would melt during the first use.[ROFL1]

crays
01-02-2014, 09:04
A camera on cray's toilet would melt during the first use.[ROFL1]

??????

Sent via my Mobile Work Avoidance Device

Skip
01-02-2014, 12:23
From listening to liberal anti-gun types in the past, they are convinced that as long as you have a single shot .22 and are only allowed to possess one bullet at a time, they are doing you and the 2A a huge favor. This is what people mean when they say they support 2A and then follow that up with "BUT"...

And the "BUT" keeps changing.

Soon 2A will only protect your right to own a pointed stick. Provided the length of pointy end is appropriate for what an activist judge says.

I just want these "judges" to reconcile precedent with the words that are coming out of their mouths. An arbitrary limitation in inherently unConstitutional. Lots of cases point this out.

crays
01-02-2014, 13:36
A camera on cray's toilet would melt during the first use.[ROFL1]


??????

Sent via my Mobile Work Avoidance Device

Forgot about chili. Excellent cross-posting there, GG!

Sent via my Mobile Work Avoidance Device