Question on mag ban.

[th3w01f]

Can anyone tell me if the technical guidance has been reversed or changed in any way? I've been searching for the last 30 minutes and I'm not finding any revised guidance.

Specifically this piece.


The phrase “continuous” possession in HB 13-1224 shall be afforded its reasonable, every-day interpretation, which is the fact of having or holding property in one’s power or the exercise of dominion over property, that is uninterrupted in time, sequence, substance or extent. “Continuous possession” does not require a large-capacity magazine owner to maintain literally continuous physical possession of the magazine. “Continuous possession” is only lost by a voluntary relinquishment of dominion and control

[Madeinhb]

Nothing has been changed

[th3w01f]

Nothing has been changed

Awesome, thanks!

[spqrzilla]

An unsatisfactory result of the lawsuit was that when we asked for a court order regarding enforcement of the language on transfers, the court basically said that the Attorney General opinion was good enough. It isn't good enough for several technical reasons, but there you are.

[BlasterBob]

Does the word "AMBIGUOUS" kinda come into play here?

[crashdown]

This is why I use clips.

[Irving]

This is why I use clips.

Yep. There was no clip ban if I recall. :p

[Dave_L]

Yep. There was no clip ban if I recall. :p

My chips appreciate that.

[DeusExMachina]

As far as I know, there still has been only one enforcement of the law. And that was a plea bargain for a dude who graffiti'd up a whole neighborhood and had a shit ton of drugs.

I'd be curious if anyone knew how to find out if anyone's been charged or convicted of the mag ban.

[Great-Kazoo]

As far as I know, there still has been only one enforcement of the law. And that was a plea bargain for a dude who graffiti'd up a whole neighborhood and had a shit ton of drugs.

I'd be curious if anyone knew how to find out if anyone's been charged or convicted of the mag ban.

EVERY MEDIA outlet from here to SEA would have it as their lead story.

[roberth]

This is why I use clips.

...and I only use them once.

[kidicarus13]

As far as I know, there still has been only one enforcement of the law. And that was a plea bargain for a dude who graffiti'd up a whole neighborhood and had a shit ton of drugs.

I'd be curious if anyone knew how to find out if anyone's been charged or convicted of the mag ban.

Contrary information Post #51
https://www.ar-15.co/showthread.php?t=146109

[BlasterBob]

Yep. There was no clip ban if I recall. :p

Yep, so if the seller calls it a clip, it must be legal then. [Sarcasm2]

[DeusExMachina]

Contrary information Post #51
https://www.ar-15.co/showthread.php?t=146109


So it seems 8. The only one I could find reported was the 1.

Not exactly contrary information.

[kidicarus13]

So it seems 8. The only one I could find reported was the 1.

Not exactly contrary information.
Ok, a number different than 1 was posted.

[DeusExMachina]

Ok, a number different than 1 was posted.

1 citation and zero convictions vs. 8 citations and zero convictions is hardly contradictory information. But we can keep arguing about it, if you like.

[O2HeN2]

This is why I use clips.
Don't forget belts, too!

O2