View Full Version : Sheriff's being threatened
BREAKING NEWS Via Don Dobyns:
On 740 AM KVOR radio this morning Sheriff Terry Maketa stated this morning in short form that the sheriffs of Colorado are being threatened, extorted and blackmailed for speaking up for our 2nd amendment rights. These threats are being initiated by the democratic party and possibly all the way to the top of the party from Senators. [Mad]
This opens the door for both state and federal investigation for possible charges.
Contact your local sheriff and encourage them to file a formal complaint, if they themselves have been threatened.
Great-Kazoo
03-09-2013, 13:38
Weld Cty. sheriff and DA have no issues handling these problems them self. Just wait until election time for the sheriffs, EVERY dirty trick, slander, innuendos no matter how false will be used to get them UN elected.
The dems need to be worried about the POSSE TARNFEATHERUS
mtnrider
03-09-2013, 14:01
Just sent Sheriff Maketa a email thanking him and letting him know we are behind him 100%.
.
Kraven251
03-09-2013, 14:10
If these people are really trying to intimidate and subtly threatening the sheriffs, I hope they don't find themselves needing their timely arrival.
Bailey Guns
03-09-2013, 14:35
I'm surprised it took so long. But, to be fair, I'd like to see some sort of statement on this other than a post on a gun forum. Anybody have any further info? I can't seem to find anything.
Just sent Sheriff Maketa a email thanking him and letting him know we are behind him 100%.
.
Just did the same and asked if there's anything I/we can do. Great idea!
Got a link or something substantial to go off of? I don't doubt the threats, but a curious to see more details.
Our sherriffs mom can handle it.
http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/s480x480/734442_539492332737777_546081561_n.jpg
I am still trying to verify also but thought I'd put it out to try and get help verifying. I did find this (highlighted portion) but is more than likely "old". (still a good read)
I've seen comments of others who claim they listened to the radio program and someone else claiming it was Bloomberg's goons
http://shr.elpasoco.com/NR/rdonlyres/31BBDA33-02D6-409E-BA00-F8E639D6F08C/0/Waldo_Canyon_Fire_Information_Banner.jpg (http://shr.elpasoco.com/NR/exeres/9B9D5A53-3BB9-4ADA-8E76-9EA79A86B0D0,frameless.htm?NRMODE=Published)
A Message from the El Paso County Sheriff's Office . . . . .
Gun Control: A Superficial Approach to a Complex Problem
http://shr.elpasoco.com/NR/rdonlyres/5F600D83-24C4-4067-A2FA-B41A7C3412E2/0/Sheriff_Maketa_Web.jpg
Sheriff Terry Maketa
Most citizens throughout El Paso County are well aware of my second amendment stance. I have recently received several emails asking my position on this subject as well as my position on gun control and weapons bans. In response, I felt obligated to take a few minutes and reaffirm my position on firearms ownership and offer a few of my concerns with the wrongful approach I see championed and pushed upon us by elected leaders at the State and Federal level. First and foremost, I absolutely believe in our Second Amendment rights. I stand firmly against, any effort that infringes on the rights of law abiding citizens to own and posses firearms of their choice. Furthermore, I will actively oppose any effort that infringes upon your second amendment rights.
Like every elected official in the state, I took an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Colorado. This means all rights. Prior to being elected as Sheriff, I took the same oath as a Deputy Sheriff and prior to my law enforcement career, I was a firearms enthusiast and sportsman. I am among the millions of Americans who chooses to exercise their right to bear arms and I avoid judgment of those who choose not to. Today and everyday into the future, I will continue to not only exercise this right but ensure that our law abiding citizens’ right to bear arms is protected. I personally believe this right among others is non-negotiable. Some have suggested this is a political issue or a right and left issue. I strongly oppose that suggestion. This is a constitutional rights issue and we should all stand by this document which is the foundation of this nation.
It is very disturbing to witness so many that have taken the same oath I have, to now flip flop and use tragedies such as the Sandy Hook school shooting to further their personal agenda and very flawed thought process. Bans such as those that have been discussed and proposed in this state and other states will not make our schools any safer. Emotionally labeling “scary looking” weapons as assault weapons and banning them will not make our schools and communities any safer. Sadly enough, those who propose these restrictions never would or could guarantee that by imposing such restrictions will ensure the safety of our communities. It does however, target law abiding citizens and chips away at our constitutional rights. The flawed thinking that the criminal or an individual intending harm will obey these laws is unrealistic and statistics have proven this year after year. The notion that restricting ammunition or requiring any form of registration is factually illogical and emotionally driven to achieve one agenda and that agenda is control. This is precisely why our forefathers had elected to give every law abiding citizen these absolute rights and why they restricted the power and authority of the government.
We as a civilized society should focus our collective efforts on the real factors contributing to the violence against children. The silent issue that society and our elected delegation refuse to address at the national and local level is how mental illness is affecting our society and the lack of resources available to address these illnesses. We should be sharing information concerning those diagnosed individuals who demonstrate violent or homicidal ideations. We should insure our mental health systems are available to all those afflicted with disorders or illnesses.
We also need to be focusing on our children and the influences they are exposed to and who and what is shaping their conceptual and analytical skills. They should be exposed to positive role models that increase their respect and appreciation for human life. They should not be consumed with influences or activities that devalue a human life. A seven or eight year old child should never be consumed with graphic and destructive video games that measure the player’s success by how many people or things they can kill. This is an element that did not exist 30 years ago. Thirty years ago children played outside in the fresh air; today they sit with a remote, a mouse or toggle in their hand. They have become desensitized from constant stimulus and don’t comprehend the value of human life or the finality of the loss of it.
Instead of the Federal Government, mainly Congress, continuing to engage in activities of which they have no authority and erodes our constitutional rights, we should focus on criminals and those who are most likely to commit acts of violence and not target the law abiding patriots of our nation.
- Sheriff Terry Maketa
http://shr.elpasoco.com/
http://shr.elpasoco.com/NR/rdonlyres/31BBDA33-02D6-409E-BA00-F8E639D6F08C/0/Waldo_Canyon_Fire_Information_Banner.jpg (http://shr.elpasoco.com/NR/exeres/9B9D5A53-3BB9-4ADA-8E76-9EA79A86B0D0,frameless.htm?NRMODE=Published)
A Message from the El Paso County Sheriff's Office . . . . .
Gun Control: A Superficial Approach to a Complex Problem
http://shr.elpasoco.com/NR/rdonlyres/5F600D83-24C4-4067-A2FA-B41A7C3412E2/0/Sheriff_Maketa_Web.jpg
Sheriff Terry Maketa
Most citizens throughout El Paso County are well aware of my second amendment stance. I have recently received several emails asking my position on this subject as well as my position on gun control and weapons bans. In response, I felt obligated to take a few minutes and reaffirm my position on firearms ownership and offer a few of my concerns with the wrongful approach I see championed and pushed upon us by elected leaders at the State and Federal level. First and foremost, I absolutely believe in our Second Amendment rights. I stand firmly against, any effort that infringes on the rights of law abiding citizens to own and posses firearms of their choice. Furthermore, I will actively oppose any effort that infringes upon your second amendment rights.
Like every elected official in the state, I took an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Colorado. This means all rights. Prior to being elected as Sheriff, I took the same oath as a Deputy Sheriff and prior to my law enforcement career, I was a firearms enthusiast and sportsman. I am among the millions of Americans who chooses to exercise their right to bear arms and I avoid judgment of those who choose not to. Today and everyday into the future, I will continue to not only exercise this right but ensure that our law abiding citizens’ right to bear arms is protected. I personally believe this right among others is non-negotiable. Some have suggested this is a political issue or a right and left issue. I strongly oppose that suggestion. This is a constitutional rights issue and we should all stand by this document which is the foundation of this nation.
It is very disturbing to witness so many that have taken the same oath I have, to now flip flop and use tragedies such as the Sandy Hook school shooting to further their personal agenda and very flawed thought process. Bans such as those that have been discussed and proposed in this state and other states will not make our schools any safer. Emotionally labeling “scary looking” weapons as assault weapons and banning them will not make our schools and communities any safer. Sadly enough, those who propose these restrictions never would or could guarantee that by imposing such restrictions will ensure the safety of our communities. It does however, target law abiding citizens and chips away at our constitutional rights. The flawed thinking that the criminal or an individual intending harm will obey these laws is unrealistic and statistics have proven this year after year. The notion that restricting ammunition or requiring any form of registration is factually illogical and emotionally driven to achieve one agenda and that agenda is control. This is precisely why our forefathers had elected to give every law abiding citizen these absolute rights and why they restricted the power and authority of the government.
We as a civilized society should focus our collective efforts on the real factors contributing to the violence against children. The silent issue that society and our elected delegation refuse to address at the national and local level is how mental illness is affecting our society and the lack of resources available to address these illnesses. We should be sharing information concerning those diagnosed individuals who demonstrate violent or homicidal ideations. We should insure our mental health systems are available to all those afflicted with disorders or illnesses.
We also need to be focusing on our children and the influences they are exposed to and who and what is shaping their conceptual and analytical skills. They should be exposed to positive role models that increase their respect and appreciation for human life. They should not be consumed with influences or activities that devalue a human life. A seven or eight year old child should never be consumed with graphic and destructive video games that measure the player’s success by how many people or things they can kill. This is an element that did not exist 30 years ago. Thirty years ago children played outside in the fresh air; today they sit with a remote, a mouse or toggle in their hand. They have become desensitized from constant stimulus and don’t comprehend the value of human life or the finality of the loss of it.
Instead of the Federal Government, mainly Congress, continuing to engage in activities of which they have no authority and erodes our constitutional rights, we should focus on criminals and those who are most likely to commit acts of violence and not target the law abiding patriots of our nation.
- Sheriff Terry Maketa
Sorry having an issue with copy/paste so put elpaso sherrif link
theGinsue
03-09-2013, 15:42
Just sent Sheriff Maketa a email thanking him and letting him know we are behind him 100%.
.
Just did the same and asked if there's anything I/we can do. Great idea!
Same here...
Sheriff Maketa,
First off I would like to say that I truly appreciate all you and your fellow Colorado Sheriff's have been doing to stand up for the Rights of our citizens. I recognize that I'm biased, but I believe that El Paso County has the best sheriff in the nation.
I've heard from the radio that you and other CO sheriff's are receiving threats. While I'm certain you have no serious concerns in this matter, I wanted you to know that there are many who are here to offer you and your office any support you require should you want and need it. I'm not referring to any sort of armed vigilante's, as we are law-abiding citizens. That said, if you put out the word, the citizens of this county will be there for you as you have been there for us.
Thank you for all you do to keep us safe and to protect our liberties.
I was told that, under executive order, sheriffs can be removed from office due to insubordination during an "emergency" defined as "public unrest." Or they could be discredited and replaced. The Democrats are well known for their history of dirty tricks against the opposition.
I can't see that going over very well
I'm sure the media will be very working hard at not letting the public know about this.
BPTactical
03-09-2013, 16:01
You want to support the Sheriffs?
Join them: http://www.csoc.org/default.asp
I called them after the House debates and thanked them, the gent who I spoke with was very appreciative of the support
Just joined. Thanks for the link
Teufelhund
03-09-2013, 16:27
I was told that, under executive order, sheriffs can be removed from office due to insubordination during an "emergency" defined as "public unrest." Or they could be discredited and replaced. The Democrats are well known for their history of dirty tricks against the opposition.
Executive Orders may only be issued to offices under direct control of the Executive Branch. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think a County Sheriff reports to the President.
OneGuy67
03-09-2013, 16:31
I was told that, under executive order, sheriffs can be removed from office due to insubordination during an "emergency" defined as "public unrest." Or they could be discredited and replaced. The Democrats are well known for their history of dirty tricks against the opposition.
Where do you keep getting all your bad information from? The answer is no, they cannot.
Bailey Guns
03-09-2013, 16:41
I was told that, under executive order, sheriffs can be removed from office due to insubordination during an "emergency" defined as "public unrest." Or they could be discredited and replaced. The Democrats are well known for their history of dirty tricks against the opposition.
Good luck with that.
Executive Orders may only be issued to offices under direct control of the Executive Branch. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think a County Sheriff reports to the President.
From what I've read Sheriffs answer to no one in there county other than the people and sometimes the coroner.
http://godfatherpolitics.com/8806/county-sheriffs-can-block-federal-gun-control/
10mm-man
03-09-2013, 17:35
Sheriff's department deserves the utmost respect! Truly outstanding group of guys representing "the People" at those hearings.
Great-Kazoo
03-09-2013, 18:40
Where do you keep getting all your bad information from? The answer is no, they cannot.
The internet, where else?
The internet, where else?
I met my girlfriend online, she is a French model,
mikedubs
03-09-2013, 18:56
I met my girlfriend online, she is a French model,
Bonjour...
http://www.mediafire.com/?g2bz2tvkuhdww3h
Radio interview with Sheriff Maketa
Given how willing the sheriffs have been to speak out for us, come election time we're going to have to return the favor.
Undoubtedly their actions have made them some powerful enemies both here in Colorado and nationally.
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
hurley842002
03-09-2013, 19:51
It truly shows the type of folks we are dealing with here, they (dems) really do think they are the "be all, end all" and will stop at nothing to further their agenda, no matter how illegal or unconstitutional it is!
Bailey Guns
03-09-2013, 19:55
If what the sheriff says in that interview is true, and I have no reason to doubt him, this is probably the most frightening thing I've ever heard of in American politics.
I can't say what I'd like to do to John Morse and some other Colorado democrats because I'd probably be jailed.
If you voted for any of these people, make no mistake...you are the ENEMY and you will eventually reap what you've sown.
[snip]
If you voted for any of these people, make no mistake...you are the ENEMY and you will eventually reap what you've sown.
QFT
Lines are being drawn.
mikedubs
03-09-2013, 21:26
Anyone forwarded this to Senate Rs? Public opinion usually rules, and political scandal is very popular stuff.
Great-Kazoo
03-09-2013, 22:24
If what the sheriff says in that interview is true, and I have no reason to doubt him, this is probably the most frightening thing I've ever heard of in American politics.
I can't say what I'd like to do to John Morse and some other Colorado democrats because I'd probably be jailed.
If you voted for any of these people, make no mistake...you are the ENEMY and you will eventually reap what you've sown.
MMMMMMMMMM a few board members come to mind.
ChunkyMonkey
03-09-2013, 22:26
MMMMMMMMMM a few board members come to mind.
More than you think. I sat down with one last month who agreed that mags limit should be in place, but he was buying some from me because he knows he wouldnt commit crazy stuffs.. Needless to say, I left.
Anyone else hear crickets???
blacklabel
03-09-2013, 22:32
More than you think. I sat down with one last month who agreed that mags limit should be in place, but he was buying some from me because he knows he wouldnt commit crazy stuffs.. Needless to say, I left.
Did you kick him in his ovaries first?
ChunkyMonkey
03-09-2013, 22:34
Did you kick him in his ovaries first?
Actually I got caught off guard... more shocked than anything else. Then pissed as I drove away.
Someone loaded it on youtube. Maybe it will go "VIRAL"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHzx3ZyXRWw
Sharpienads
03-09-2013, 23:53
I've posted this on my FB, the local news' tip line and their FB, and on CO Accountability's FB. Everybody needs to spread this around as much as possible.
BPTactical
03-10-2013, 06:59
Does the Colorado AG have a FB/Twitter? Or at the least e mail him the info.
tmleadr03
03-10-2013, 08:28
Someone loaded it on youtube. Maybe it will go "VIRAL"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHzx3ZyXRWw
Posted to my FB.
UrbanWolf
03-10-2013, 09:36
So much for the Hippie peace lovers.
I find it ironic that there's a man beign charged with doing this very thing to one of the representatives, and yet the opposite is happening to the Sheriffs.
To be fair, quite a gap between threatening someone's life and threatening to not authorize them a pay raise. However, your point is an excellent one.
Where do you keep getting all your bad information from? The answer is no, they cannot.
The internet, where else?
From what I've read Sheriffs answer to no one in there county other than the people and sometimes the coroner.
Alright. Please correct me if I'm wrong . . . because I truly hope I am wrong on this . . . but it was my understanding that a series of Executive Orders signed by every POTUS since LBJ has created the DHS, thereby networking all Federal law enforcement agencies with all state and local law enforcement, and enabling DHS, assisted by the military, to oversee and control local law enforcement during time of a declared "emergency" upon POTUS authorization. That would mean that, in the event of civil disturbances resulting from enforcement of various firearm prohibitions, the .gov could disregard Posse Comitatus and take total control over local law enforcement agencies, including the Sheriff Department. Is this untrue?
Sharpienads
03-10-2013, 15:37
Update from local news station:
http://i1133.photobucket.com/albums/m591/Sharpienads/Capture-2_zps6ccc2de1.jpg
Sharpienads
03-10-2013, 22:10
I just caught the tail end of a local news station covering this. John Dickhead Morse was vehemently denying the accusations. They also said Sheriff Maketa will be talking more about this in a couple days.
Aloha_Shooter
03-10-2013, 23:28
My heart would be just broken to see John Morse charged with extortion and illicit political persuasion over this. Just heart-broken.
buffalobo
03-10-2013, 23:34
I just caught the tail end of a local news station covering this. John Dickhead Morse was vehemently denying the accusations. They also said Sheriff Maketa will be talking more about this in a couple days.
Which station?
Would sure like to see many sheriffs on TV bitch slapping legislature with this.
mtnrider
03-11-2013, 08:32
I just caught the tail end of a local news station covering this. John Dickhead Morse was vehemently denying the accusations. They also said Sheriff Maketa will be talking more about this in a couple days.
I saw that on the news this morning. I have a feeling Sheriff Maketa may be in for a rough ride. These douchebags are going to slander him at every oppurtunity now.
.
ChadAmberg
03-11-2013, 08:50
My heart would be just broken to see John Morse charged with extortion and illicit political persuasion over this. Just heart-broken.
I wonder if we can get enough $$ together to put up a billboard across from his office, "John Morse: Fascist and Traitor to the Constitution and human rights"
Posted on the El Paso County Sheriff's homepage:
Gun Control: A Superficial Approach to a Complex Problem
Sheriff Terry Maketa
Most citizens throughout El Paso County are well aware of my second amendment stance. I have recently received several emails asking my position on this subject as well as my position on gun control and weapons bans. In response, I felt obligated to take a few minutes and reaffirm my position on firearms ownership and offer a few of my concerns with the wrongful approach I see championed and pushed upon us by elected leaders at the State and Federal level. First and foremost, I absolutely believe in our Second Amendment rights. I stand firmly against, any effort that infringes on the rights of law abiding citizens to own and posses firearms of their choice. Furthermore, I will actively oppose any effort that infringes upon your second amendment rights.
Like every elected official in the state, I took an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Colorado. This means all rights. Prior to being elected as Sheriff, I took the same oath as a Deputy Sheriff and prior to my law enforcement career, I was a firearms enthusiast and sportsman. I am among the millions of Americans who chooses to exercise their right to bear arms and I avoid judgment of those who choose not to. Today and everyday into the future, I will continue to not only exercise this right but ensure that our law abiding citizens’ right to bear arms is protected. I personally believe this right among others is non-negotiable. Some have suggested this is a political issue or a right and left issue. I strongly oppose that suggestion. This is a constitutional rights issue and we should all stand by this document which is the foundation of this nation.
It is very disturbing to witness so many that have taken the same oath I have, to now flip flop and use tragedies such as the Sandy Hook school shooting to further their personal agenda and very flawed thought process. Bans such as those that have been discussed and proposed in this state and other states will not make our schools any safer. Emotionally labeling “scary looking” weapons as assault weapons and banning them will not make our schools and communities any safer. Sadly enough, those who propose these restrictions never would or could guarantee that by imposing such restrictions will ensure the safety of our communities. It does however, target law abiding citizens and chips away at our constitutional rights. The flawed thinking that the criminal or an individual intending harm will obey these laws is unrealistic and statistics have proven this year after year. The notion that restricting ammunition or requiring any form of registration is factually illogical and emotionally driven to achieve one agenda and that agenda is control. This is precisely why our forefathers had elected to give every law abiding citizen these absolute rights and why they restricted the power and authority of the government.
We as a civilized society should focus our collective efforts on the real factors contributing to the violence against children. The silent issue that society and our elected delegation refuse to address at the national and local level is how mental illness is affecting our society and the lack of resources available to address these illnesses. We should be sharing information concerning those diagnosed individuals who demonstrate violent or homicidal ideations. We should insure our mental health systems are available to all those afflicted with disorders or illnesses.
We also need to be focusing on our children and the influences they are exposed to and who and what is shaping their conceptual and analytical skills. They should be exposed to positive role models that increase their respect and appreciation for human life. They should not be consumed with influences or activities that devalue a human life. A seven or eight year old child should never be consumed with graphic and destructive video games that measure the player’s success by how many people or things they can kill. This is an element that did not exist 30 years ago. Thirty years ago children played outside in the fresh air; today they sit with a remote, a mouse or toggle in their hand. They have become desensitized from constant stimulus and don’t comprehend the value of human life or the finality of the loss of it.
Instead of the Federal Government, mainly Congress, continuing to engage in activities of which they have no authority and erodes our constitutional rights, we should focus on criminals and those who are most likely to commit acts of violence and not target the law abiding patriots of our nation.
- Sheriff Terry Maketa
[Beer]
mtnrider
03-11-2013, 09:18
The secretary of information just reponded to my email that I sent Sheriff Maketa thanking him and giving him my 100% support. Said she appreciated the kind words of support and will pass it on to the Sheriff.
We need to orginize a BBQ/Rally in support of Sheriff Maketa. [Beer]
..
Bailey Guns
03-11-2013, 09:21
Governor Maketa? Sounds OK...
Geology Rocks
03-11-2013, 09:22
Glenn Beck is talking about this issue right now on the radio fyi.
mtnrider
03-11-2013, 09:39
Governor Maketa? Sounds OK...
Has a nice ring to it. I like it!
.
Aloha_Shooter
03-11-2013, 10:50
I wonder if we can get enough $$ together to put up a billboard across from his office, "John Morse: Fascist and Traitor to the Constitution and human rights"
Get a quote -- I'm in for a chunk of change.
Sharpienads
03-11-2013, 11:01
I'd donate as well.
Aloha_Shooter
03-11-2013, 11:45
Better yet, can someone get a quote from TAPMedia for a large sign on the back of the Colorado Springs Metro Transit buses? I can't get to their website from work but I'm thinking something in big letters on the backside of every bus in the city (especially the ones servicing the routes in his district) reading: "John Morse hates your right to self defense // Let's restore democracy in Denver"
An Injustice Against our Citizens
By Terry Maketa, Sheriff
Monday, March 4, 2013, was unlike any day I’ve experienced in my 12 years testifying at the Colorado State Capitol. During my tenure, I’ve had numerous opportunities to participate in legislative processes from draft proposal to signature of a bill making it law.
I’ve witnessed many hearings and observed citizens, law enforcement, and special interest groups share opinions on a variety of proposed laws. I’ve witnessed very controversial bills set in a process to allow full access from supporters, opponents, and citizens to be heard by their legislators. On numerous occasions, bills similar in nature were set for hearing on different days to ensure opportunity for anyone to participate in the deliberative process. On Monday, this didn’t occur. Instead, gun bills were simultaneously scheduled and of 25 plus sheriffs, only one could testify per bill. Hearings were split so bills heard simultaneously were on different floors, even though all were heard by senate committees. Rules for testimony changed three times from Thursday afternoon through Monday at 10:30 am, when hearings began.
Historically, any citizen would be allowed to speak if they arrived at the Capitol early and signed up on testimony records. Although sign up sheets were in place and citizens including myself signed up, we were completely disregarded. Minutes after I signed up to testify, I learned a different process would be utilized and testimony was based on three categories: experts, preferred witnesses, and public witnesses. No explanation was provided to define expert or preferred witness. I was told this decision was made by the senate president and the chairperson of the hearing committee. Additionally, experts would have no time constraints and all others would be restricted to three minutes. I was completely disheartened at what I was witnessing and this was exacerbated when I learned experts included an individual that was not a resident of Colorado who had no credentials to qualify as an expert except his spouse was a victim of the Tuscan Arizona shooting. He admitted he had not read the proposed bill and could not speak to any specifics regarding this bill. He encouraged Colorado to adopt universal background checks and close the gun show loophole, both of which already exist. Sadly, he testified with unlimited restriction as voters and taxpayers of this state sat helplessly as they were denied the right to testify during committee hearings.
My colleague, Sheriff John Cooke, testified in opposition of the “Universal Background Check” bill on behalf of most sheriffs while staying within the three minute constraint. Fortunately, I was allowed to testify because a member of the legislature listed me as an expert witness. I was honored and brought statistics and facts as it related to the national insta-check system (NICS); the probable criminalization of law abiding citizens and the unenforceability of this particular bill. I offered other options knowing we all share the common goal of reducing violence. I was proud to represent my constituents and the majority of our sheriffs. That pride was quickly diminished as I departed the hearing room and witnessed hundreds of citizens who would not be given the opportunity to testify. Although they expressed their sincere appreciation for my comments, I recognized the injustice that was unfolding before my eyes. Citizens of Colorado were prevented from participating in the legislative process. Their rights had been overridden by the agenda of a few members of the State Senate.
As I made my way out of the Capitol, I was shocked at the number of people who attended these hearings. It’s estimated the number of people in attendance reached 1,000. I spoke to several and was told they just wanted their voice to be heard. Many of them had never been to the Capitol, let alone testified on any bill. Some brought their children as a lesson in civics and sacrificed a day at work to participate in the law making process. Unfortunately, what they hoped for never happened.
Due to a prior commitment, I could not stay for the remaining bills. Later, I phoned a member of our legislature and expressed concern for what I had witnessed; changing of rules, time limits, new classification of speakers to establish priority and most of all the number of citizens who made the journey to the Capitol in hopes of being heard. I was told the rules did change several times and that this was very unusual. These changes were driven by the majority leadership, Senator John Morse, and the chairperson of the involved hearing committee.
I am not sharing this because of the outcome of the hearings that day; rather I am sharing this because of the process implemented and the faces of all those citizens that were never permitted to participate in the process. Government is supposed to be by the people, for the people and on this day, they were crushed and kicked to the side. Special interest coalitions and hand picked experts with no relevant expertise trumped our citizens.
To add insult to injury, the following Wednesday, I received an email containing the following language from a member of County Sheriffs Of Colorado: “…I have been advised by a reliable source at the Capitol that the Dems are seriously not pleased with the CSOC positions on the gun bills, and given the potential for a real salary bill to be introduced as you shall see from a follow-up email from” (an unnamed sheriff), “support of SB197 would put us in a more favorable light for salary bill support from the Dems. I do not believe we would be sacrificing our principles or positions on the other gun bills by supporting SB197.” “...Please let us know what you think on this proposal ASAP as I need to get a letter from us to the Senate Dems before the close of business today.” As I see it, senate Dems have made it known, “sheriffs, obey or no pay for you.” The first word that comes to my mind is extortion. Again, I’m disheartened that the pay of sheriffs is threatened to gain compliance with the majority party leadership. Local elected officials’ pay is set by the legislature as stated in Colorado Law. The previous governor’s process brought the need for a pay increase before the legislature and that legislature is attempting to buy compliance. I have great admiration for my fellow sheriffs; they are true professionals with high morals and principles. Having served with many of them for years, I can say they are men of honor with a passion to serve and do what’s right. I will not speak for them, but I personally will not concede to these threats, stand by while coercive acts such as this go without mention, nor will I compromise my values and beliefs for a justified pay raise based on studies performed by a bi-partisan commission formed by the democrat leadership. To be clear, this salary recommendation would have no affect on me, as I am term limited. Setting salaries is the responsibility of the legislature. This authority should not be used as a tool of coercion, but unfortunately it appears to have become such a device and there is nothing to suggest otherwise
Bailey Guns
03-12-2013, 08:05
“It had absolutely nothing ever to do with guns, ever. That's just so fabricated it's just completely ridiculous and absurd," Morse said. "How dare you not get the facts before you make an allegation.”
Morse said he was still too livid to try and speak with Maketa.
What the fuck does Morse know about facts? He is such a scumbag and he proved that over and over in the last 10 days.
Aloha_Shooter
03-12-2013, 08:45
What the fuck does Morse know about facts? He is such a scumbag and he proved that over and over in the last 10 days.
+1
liberty19
03-12-2013, 09:05
Governor Maketa? Sounds OK...
My thoughts exactly.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.