Printable View
This is what is most disturbing. Hard core liberals truly do wish harm on conservatives. They don't want to live and let live, they want us eliminated. Theu want us dead. Just like when they were wishing the feds would just go in and kill the folks at the wildlife refuge to end it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Lebowski
Liberals aren't just the enemies of freedom politically, they truly are our enemies in the truest definition of the word.
RIP Justice Scalia, may God speed.
Do any of you believe or, better question, would any of you actually register or turn in your firearms if a "new" supreme court upheld an Australian or British type scheme? Would you? I will not, under any circumstances, do so.
I am old enough to KNOW what the Constitution says and what it means and any more laws passed that infringe on our rights will be ignored and I believe that, at least within my remaining life span, that any LEO would not even try to enforce any laws like that. Do any of you think that the "Militia" movement would not become larger than ever before?
When the nomination of the new justice candidate is made we must absolutely deluge the senate with our disdain for that candidate. If the senate does actually ask their questions, the meaning of the second amendment is a supremely qualifying question that must be considered and past opinions must be taken into account on the second amendment issue.
III
This goes on both sides of the aisle. We see it here every single day. I don't want to belabor that point though.Quote:
Originally Posted by hollohas
This is the period in time when we need a man like Hugo Black. A liberal democrat party senator who became an originalist Supreme Court Justice very similar in ideology to Scalia and truly believed in the original meaning and original interpretation of the Constitution. Obama would get his liberal, we would get another originalist justice.
Original hippies from the 60's and 70's tend to be very libertarian and nearly conservative by today's standards. However, I believe that population is quickly dwindling.
^^ Like Hillary Clinton?
As far as your first paragraph- a "Law" such as you suggest would clearly and plainly NOT be constitutional and therefore wholly invalid.Quote:
Originally Posted by wctriumph
One is not bound to abide by unconstitutional and invalid law.
As far as the second point quoted, of course there are LE that would enforce unconstitutional and invalid laws.
Their pensions and paychecks are far more important than your rights.
I have to disagree. Most Conservatives take a "live and let live" approach. If it doesn't effect me, I don't care even when someone else demands I do. The reason Liberals catch hell here is because they insist on reaching into our lives and deciding how we can live. They threaten on a nearly daily basis to make us criminals and ruin our lives for being gun owners. Do we really do the same?Quote:
Originally Posted by Irving
I can also tolerate an opinion with which I don't agree. Even be friendly and amicable with the other party. A Liberal cannot tolerate disagreement even when the point changes through time and they must "get in their faces" at all costs.
Radical transformation means something. It means you have to change even both your will and the law say you don't shouldn't have to. Imagine Conservatives imposing a radical transformation on Liberals? What would that even look like? Imagine abortion rights treated the same way as gun rights (with the same consequences for breaking the law). A balanced budget and tax reform (flat/fair) even. End to welfare without work. Affirmation Action would be over and people would be treated based on who they rather than skin color. Closed borders. Etc, etc, etc...
When we see some of this ^ I'll let you say it goes the same on both sides.
A justice of the peace declared Scalia died of natural causes, without ever seeing the body, and declined an autopsy.
Nope, nuthin' to see here!
Wow. Just wow.