Printable View
I only heard some at the beginning, and some just before the break, but this is what struck me the most. I get that there is some story telling element to all this, but without trying to sound callous, how important is it that anyone knows how it affected Ford? It seems to me that the real question is whether or not it happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip
This is maddening. The media/Dems, etc think it's a'ok to destroy a good man over something that may, or more likely may not have, happened when he was a boy. Makes me sick.
As for her obvious BS. I partied a lot in HS. And I can remember every house we partied at. The notion that she "remembers" in such great detail what "happened" but can't remember where it happened is horseshit.
Listening to Dem congressmen complain about how sad it is that the country has become so uncivilized and mean, when they are the worst offenders as they destroy a good man with ZERO evidence and with political motives, puts my blood pressure through the roof.
This Republic is in major trouble...
No other girls at the same party that had been assaulted at the same party have come forward. Her story is just that, a story. No evidence. Just the Dem machine in full retard mode to kill this nomination, hopefully take the senate and have control on the next SCOTUS nomination.
This seems to be the dividing line between both camps.Quote:
Originally Posted by Irving
You have Libs saying that her emotional testimony creates credibility but then Conservatives looking at the cold facts and not able to find anything this morning that increased Ford's credibility.
There seems to be a strong feeling on the Left that her emotion presents a very real account that doesn't require any validation.
---
Ford has just claimed Leland (Ingram) Keyser (one of her best friends and named witnesses) has mental issues in response why Keyser can't corroborate any of her claims.
---
Can't even consistently name the year between all statements made in the last two months...
https://twitter.com/infolibnews/stat...77987468828674Quote:
Christine Blasey Ford admitted under oath that she crossed out the word "early" in her August 7th post-polygraph notes.
She couldn't say for certain on August 7th the Kavanaugh incident happened in the "early" 1980's but now she knows it happened in 1982? #KavanaughHearings
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoHtnsPVsAcRKhm.jpg:small
My 14yo writes better notes than that.
Ford is a useful idiot.
Chris Garrett--not sure where this going...
Backstory: A guy who seemed a little off (Ed Whelen) had presented a theory on twitter that this was a case of mistaken ID. I didn't post it because, frankly, Whelen was doing exactly what Ford was doing to Kavanaugh by implicating someone who couldn't be proven to have assaulted Ford.
Whelen got his pecker smacked good, apologized, and has deleted the thread. It was very involved right down to the flooplan of Garrett's family home matching Ford's description.
At the time Ford said she knew Garrett but couldn't possibly confuse them.
https://twitter.com/PeterAlexander/s...52281061240833
She has now admitted to dating him.
Lots more...
https://jonathanturley.org/2018/09/2...into-the-fray/
https://i0.wp.com/jonathanturley.org...9/IMG_0026.jpg
Yeah, I heard her say she tried to "yell" for help and that her attacker covered her mouth. That's not the same as saying, "Stop! Don't do that. NO! I don't want to." That's the sort of thing that a victim will inevitably say she said to her attacker, especially in a relatively non-violent incident like this one.
Ford and the entire democrat machine is full of shit.
Kavanaugh to senate democrats: "You have replaced 'advise and consent with search and destroy'". Kavanaugh is hammering democrats.
You can't be serious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey Guns