Friend walked in on a burglary.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

Couple of points. None of those links have anything to do with Colorado or 18-1-704.5. The other thing is no one is saying they'd just rush in and shoot someone. That's something you and brutal have made up in a lame attempt to support your incorrect position. You've made the assertion that a person entering his own home knowing an intruder is inside is some sort of violation of some law. That simply isn't the case.

You even have an attorney here telling you you're incorrect.

The "Make My Day" law is called a "Castle Doctrine" law for a reason. In simple terms it falls under a legal doctrine that says a man's home is his castle and he can do whatever is necessary to defend it...whether he's inside when the invasion occurs or arrives home and discovers it. You've provided absolutely ZERO proof other than your "opinion" to substantiate your claims. Please explain the legal doctrine you're using to come up with this ridiculous assertion. Because you and brutal are starting to look pretty silly.

---

You didn't scroll down far enough...

I thought JM said he was done on page 2 of this thread. Guess he can't help arguing his wrong point of view.

Oh and BTW JM and brutal...I would listen to spqrzilla. If he says you are making incorrect statements, I'd take that to the bank. Please refer to the about me tab at the following link:

http://www.ar-15.co/members/4247-spqrzilla

Notice anything?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0

You didn't scroll down far enough...

---

Don't blame the victim!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0

You didn't scroll down far enough...

---

Where?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

Where?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0

And before you just my ass about these... This is a joke...


I've had to sit and listen to this dude's sob story for the last two years...

You haven't heard anything until you've heard it straight from the guy's mouth...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1211230.html

---

Right there.

You're right. I didn't read that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PugnacAutMortem

I thought JM said he was done on page 2 of this thread. Guess he can't help arguing his wrong point of view.

Oh and BTW JM and brutal...I would listen to spqrzilla. If he says you are making incorrect statements, I'd take that to the bank. Please refer to the about me tab at the following link:

http://www.ar-15.co/members/4247-spqrzilla

Notice anything?

---

And mine says King Of Pantyland.... What's your point? Just because he's an attorney doesn't mean anything. I'm still telling you what's going to happen. Even if you beat back masses of bullshit you're still going to go through more suffering than it's worth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

You're right. I didn't read that.

---

No hard feelings. I didn't think you had.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0

And mine says King Of Pantyland.... What's your point? Just because he's an attorney doesn't mean anything. I'm still telling you what's going to happen. Even if you beat back masses of bullshit you're still going to go through more suffering than it's worth.

---

Actually...if I understand the meaning of the word...him being an attorney means his comments are quite a bit more valuable to the discussion than yours. If he said you're wrong, then by golly you just might not be right.

And by the way, that's not the point you've been arguing this whole time. I don't think anyone would disagree with the fact that if you shoot someone, even in your own home, that you're going to have to deal with a buttload of shit thrown your way. You have been arguing that you will go to prison FOREVER if you shot someone in your home (in this situation). That's the incorrect opinion you have.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PugnacAutMortem

Actually...if I understand the meaning of the word...him being an attorney means his comments are quite a bit more valuable to the discussion than yours. If he said you're wrong, then by golly you just might not be right.

And by the way, that's not the point you've been arguing this whole time. I don't think anyone would disagree with the fact that if you shoot someone, even in your own home, that you're going to have to deal with a buttload of shit thrown your way. You have been arguing that you will go to prison FOREVER if you shot someone in your home (in this situation). That's the incorrect opinion you have.

---

Whether it's right or wrong... You're probably going to end up in jail for a lot longer than it's worth. Zimmerman is a good example... Even if he was right in shooting the kid, he's still going through more than it's worth.