Friend walked in on a burglary.

[Bailey Guns]

You didn't scroll down far enough...

Where?

[JM Ver. 2.0]

Where?

And before you just my ass about these... This is a joke...


I've had to sit and listen to this dude's sob story for the last two years...

You haven't heard anything until you've heard it straight from the guy's mouth...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1211230.html

Right there.

[Bailey Guns]

You're right. I didn't read that.

[JM Ver. 2.0]

I thought JM said he was done on page 2 of this thread. Guess he can't help arguing his wrong point of view.

Oh and BTW JM and brutal...I would listen to spqrzilla. If he says you are making incorrect statements, I'd take that to the bank. Please refer to the about me tab at the following link:

http://www.ar-15.co/members/4247-spqrzilla

Notice anything?

And mine says King Of Pantyland.... What's your point? Just because he's an attorney doesn't mean anything. I'm still telling you what's going to happen. Even if you beat back masses of bullshit you're still going to go through more suffering than it's worth.

[JM Ver. 2.0]

You're right. I didn't read that.

No hard feelings. I didn't think you had.

[PugnacAutMortem]

And mine says King Of Pantyland.... What's your point? Just because he's an attorney doesn't mean anything. I'm still telling you what's going to happen. Even if you beat back masses of bullshit you're still going to go through more suffering than it's worth.

Actually...if I understand the meaning of the word...him being an attorney means his comments are quite a bit more valuable to the discussion than yours. If he said you're wrong, then by golly you just might not be right.

And by the way, that's not the point you've been arguing this whole time. I don't think anyone would disagree with the fact that if you shoot someone, even in your own home, that you're going to have to deal with a buttload of shit thrown your way. You have been arguing that you will go to prison FOREVER if you shot someone in your home (in this situation). That's the incorrect opinion you have.

[JM Ver. 2.0]

Actually...if I understand the meaning of the word...him being an attorney means his comments are quite a bit more valuable to the discussion than yours. If he said you're wrong, then by golly you just might not be right.

And by the way, that's not the point you've been arguing this whole time. I don't think anyone would disagree with the fact that if you shoot someone, even in your own home, that you're going to have to deal with a buttload of shit thrown your way. You have been arguing that you will go to prison FOREVER if you shot someone in your home (in this situation). That's the incorrect opinion you have.

Whether it's right or wrong... You're probably going to end up in jail for a lot longer than it's worth. Zimmerman is a good example... Even if he was right in shooting the kid, he's still going through more than it's worth.

[BushMasterBoy]

You can Google "castle doctrine convictions" and get a ton of cases cited where folks are convicted and other cases where the conviction is overturned. Personally, I just prefer to let local law enforcement handle the bad guys. Let the cops shoot the fuckers if they get violent, this is the best return on tax dollar investment in my opinion! The state and its various employees have this "elitist" attitude towards the common citizens, claiming everything they do is to the letter of the law, but the truth is the state rarely punishes its own for lethal mistakes. Hey, we have the best justice system money can buy...

[PugnacAutMortem]

Whether it's right or wrong... You're probably going to end up in jail for a lot longer than it's worth. Zimmerman is a good example... Even if he was right in shooting the kid, he's still going through more than it's worth.

Zimmerman is actually a terrible example, because that has nothing to do with A) Colorado law and B) a dwelling of any kind. Come on now, I'm just trying to keep you on track here. Like I said, I don't think anyone would argue it would be a completely smooth process without any hiccups. What I would argue is that you would go to jail for the rest of your life...which means you would have been charged and convicted of 1st degree murder...in this situation. You still sticking by that opinion? Or are you going to keep redirecting?

[JM Ver. 2.0]

Zimmerman is actually a terrible example, because that has nothing to do with A) Colorado law and B) a dwelling of any kind. Come on now, I'm just trying to keep you on track here. Like I said, I don't think anyone would argue it would be a completely smooth process without any hiccups. What I would argue is that you would go to jail for the rest of your life...which means you would have been charged and convicted of 1st degree murder...in this situation. You still sticking by that opinion? Or are you going to keep redirecting?

Actually it's a fine example of how the court BS would play out...

And no, I'm still sticking with you'd be charged with something.