Every headline I've seen says something along the lines of "Russia tried to influence elections for a Trump victory." *(bolding is mine).
Tried? Big deal. That doesn't affect the legitimacy of the election.
Printable View
Every headline I've seen says something along the lines of "Russia tried to influence elections for a Trump victory." *(bolding is mine).
Tried? Big deal. That doesn't affect the legitimacy of the election.
Exactly.
And of course the selective lack of reporting on every election in history in which some external party had an interest in our elections. Not to mention Obama directly meddling in elections (Israel, Egypt [Arab Spring] come to mind).
Previously today (and yesterday) headlines were worded to make it sound like Russia directly hacked the vote. That has now changed so they are backing off that claim.
They are acting like Wikileaks is a Russian front as well. That is how they are claiming the influence.
If the Russians hacked the vote then prove it otherwise its....whats the phrase sombody?? Oh right, I remember Fake News! Gasps!!
Velocitas, Opprimere,
Violentia Operandi
C'mon guys. It's anything but their candidate and their agenda. They were embarrassed by the election and are still in denial. They say it's the Russians and you can't prove that it wasn't. That's empirical evidence to a liberal.
The "protesters" at trump tower look like off hour hipsters and the I won an award crowd. Couldn't get close enough to snap a pic. Or as I told one of the cops, a bunch of well dressed homeless looking for a handout.