PRESIDENT TRUMP!

[cstone]

Stein may be appealing to the Michigan Supreme Court, but they would be the only ones who find her appealing.

I wonder what the loony left will look forward to after December 19th?

[Circuits]

Stein may be appealing to the Michigan Supreme Court, but they would be the only ones who find her appealing.

I wonder what the loony left will look forward to after December 19th?

Crackpot hope that on 1/3 either the new congress will decertify all the republican EC votes, or try a cray-cray parliamentary move (that won't work) to confirm Merrick Garland to SCOTUS before certifying the new class of Senators.

[CS1983]

Stein may be appealing to the Michigan Supreme Court, but they would be the only ones who find her appealing.

I wonder what the loony left will look forward to after December 19th?

Shades of Adlai Stevenson's famous quip, sir?

[Skip]

Democrats, RINOs lose their minds.

http://www.denverpost.com/2016/12/12...iefing-demand/

http://www.denverpost.com/2016/12/12...free-electors/

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...-hacking-probe


Recounts appear to be finished or blocked by judges who know better, no joy for Dems. So it looks like they've moved on to trying to subvert the EC with concerns about Russian hacking. I've been trying to find precise details on what the CIA claims was hacked and can only reference to email hacking.


ETA: "National Emergency!"

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/c...nal-emergency/

[Irving]

Every headline I've seen says something along the lines of "Russia tried to influence elections for a Trump victory." *(bolding is mine).

Tried? Big deal. That doesn't affect the legitimacy of the election.

[Skip]

Every headline I've seen says something along the lines of "Russia tried to influence elections for a Trump victory." *(bolding is mine).

Tried? Big deal. That doesn't affect the legitimacy of the election.

Exactly.

And of course the selective lack of reporting on every election in history in which some external party had an interest in our elections. Not to mention Obama directly meddling in elections (Israel, Egypt [Arab Spring] come to mind).

Previously today (and yesterday) headlines were worded to make it sound like Russia directly hacked the vote. That has now changed so they are backing off that claim.

[Great-Kazoo]

Every headline I've seen says something along the lines of "Russia tried to influence elections for a Trump victory." *(bolding is mine).

Tried? Big deal. That doesn't affect the legitimacy of the election.

Not as much as the Dems TRYING to overturn the 2016 vote. BUT... BUT... BUT... That Dano is a classic true believer on the DP comments section

[Jamnanc]

They are acting like Wikileaks is a Russian front as well. That is how they are claiming the influence.

[Joe_K]

If the Russians hacked the vote then prove it otherwise its....whats the phrase sombody?? Oh right, I remember Fake News! Gasps!!

Velocitas, Opprimere,
Violentia Operandi

[Gman]

C'mon guys. It's anything but their candidate and their agenda. They were embarrassed by the election and are still in denial. They say it's the Russians and you can't prove that it wasn't. That's empirical evidence to a liberal.