I meant no offense to you, sir. I should have said "I really hope that's photoshopped." Cuz that thing be scary, yo.
Printable View
It seems you may be over-simplifying the issue. Some have displayed their intent, but intent =/= action. It’s simply a precursor to a potential scenario that may or may not happen. You are correct in that they have used weapons. However, you and I both know the sticks, glass bottles, and spray cans they have used up to now are not nearly as effective as firearms. If they start to use firearms, I believe they will/should be met with extreme force. Unlike any they have experienced.
As retarded as it is, I do believe some of them are legitimately buying for their protection because they fear the current administration. It’s genuinely difficult to tell who is buying weapons for defense and who is buying for offense.
I also believe that increased responsibility CAN drive individuals to become more responsible people. Not in all cases, of course. I’m simply hoping for the best among a multitude of potential scenarios.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Conveyed intent + displayed means to affect = actionable even if $present != action
http://scontent.fapa1-1.fna.fbcdn.ne...81&oe=5A79E2F5
Probably not entirely accurate, but funny nonetheless...
I'm not concerned about getting shot by ANTIFA at a protest.
because I never attend protests and don't plan to start.
Isn't that one of the things we pay cops to do on our (law abiding citizens') behalf? - Enforce the law against illegal protests.
I still wonder what purpose or benefit there is in protesting.
I guess I just have too many better things to do and concern myself with.