In other CO legislative news- CO General Assembly Passes Civil Unions Bill

Is it safe to say the overwhelming majority of Colorado State Legislators who voted for Civil Unions, are the same ones who voted for gun restrictions?
And, the overwhelming majority of those that voted against Civil Unions, voted against gun restrictions?

Might be time to zero your compass.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davsel

I am certain I have heard that broken record applied by liberals to the United States Constitution; specifically the 2nd Amendment.
Just an observation.

---

I was going to point out this same thing.

Damn glad I stopped in this thread (popcorn)

I am ok with it as long as someone enacts a high capacity condom ban those extra 2 inches are the dangerous ones

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davsel

Speaking of stereotypes, at no point an any of my posts, here or elsewhere, did I ever speak of hating anyone.

First law: Love God
Second: Love everyone as yourself

Not all "religious types" are hate-filled Westboro Baptist followers. I have often stood between Phelps and funeral attendees as a Patriot Guard Rider.
I have a very close lesbian LE friend and several lesbian acquaintances (through my wife's work), and more than one gay family member. I was friends with several homosexuals while serving 21 years in the USAF (during a time when it was a private matter). I try to love 'em all. I do not agree with their lifestyle, and they know this. Hate does not come into the equation.

You will be perfectly safe wearing your gay pride pin in my presence. I will not even bring up the subject. However, if you bring it up, I will openly share my beliefs. Take 'em or leave 'em. Agreeing to disagree is no problem for me. Some will hear, most will not.

---

Now you're backpedaling. You earlier called for them to not have the rights they seek (I never knew God relinquished his powers to you), now you have no problem as long as they keep it quiet?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davsel

I am certain I have heard that broken record applied by liberals to the United States Constitution; specifically the 2nd Amendment.
Just an observation.

---

Ah, a reaching argument, nice try. Okay, so come strike me down, because my next statement can be construed as blasphemous and according to the old testament I shall be put to death... The BIBLE was written by men, it is not the word of God himself. Since you believe we must follow the bible... Oh and you better go after those Muslims, Buddhists, Pagans, Satanists, Jedi, and Taoists because they put false Gods before your one true God. This is the reason why my interpretation and following of the Christian faith fails to conform to the organized system of beliefs because I use logic and reason to realize that the Bible, A) cannot be interpreted literally, and B) was written by man, not God and thus should be regarded as such (ie, pun sorry, not in fact Gospel, but as tales and examples of doing good and clarifying right and wrong loosely).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronin13

... The BIBLE was written by men, it is not the word of God himself. Since you believe we must follow the bible... Oh and you better go after those Muslims, Buddhists, Pagans, Satanists, Jedi, and Taoists because they put false Gods before your one true God. This is the reason why my interpretation and following of the Christian faith fails to conform to the organized system of beliefs because I use logic and reason to realize that the Bible, A) cannot be interpreted literally, and B) was written by man, not God and thus should be regarded as such (ie, pun sorry, not in fact Gospel, but as tales and examples of doing good and clarifying right and wrong loosely).

---

FWIW
I once believed as you do now. I spent years arguing with "Christians" over the origins and interpretations of the Bible, written by man, cause of war, used for control of the masses/finances, great moral stories, etc.

What changed my mind was when a friend gave me a copy of a Greek/English translation of the New Testament. She wanted to take away my argument of translation differences. I read it front to back and became a believer about half way through. I then spent a couple of years studying the Bible through college courses and on my own. It has made a defining difference in my life.
YMMV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davsel

FWIW
I once believed as you do now. I spent years arguing with "Christians" over the origins and interpretations of the Bible, written by man, cause of war, used for control of the masses/finances, great moral stories, etc.

What changed my mind was when a friend gave me a copy of a Greek/English translation of the New Testament. She wanted to take away my argument of translation differences. I read it front to back and became a believer about half way through. I then spent a couple of years studying the Bible through college courses and on my own. It has made a defining difference in my life.
YMMV

---

Then by that argument even the Greek to English translation holds no weight because you'll need to learn Aramaic and Hebrew if you want the full meaning.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davsel

FWIW
I once believed as you do now. I spent years arguing with "Christians" over the origins and interpretations of the Bible, written by man, cause of war, used for control of the masses/finances, great moral stories, etc.

What changed my mind was when a friend gave me a copy of a Greek/English translation of the New Testament. She wanted to take away my argument of translation differences. I read it front to back and became a believer about half way through. I then spent a couple of years studying the Bible through college courses and on my own. It has made a defining difference in my life.
YMMV

---

That's the beauty of the ideas passed on by Jefferson- he wasn't anti-religion, he simply said that one's religion is the business of that individual, not the state nor the church. That's kind of how I believe... We all choose to believe whatever we like, and I choose to believe, and acknowledge that the bible was still written by men. Men, who at the time thought it wrong to lay with another man, covet their neighbors wives (covet, not pursue), depictions of pornography (guilty here!), and many other things that are not viewed as bad these days. I look at the evolution of our society as a dictation of moral "good," this may sound liberal, but I do retain some limitations based on my morals and beliefs. Look at the 1820's... Slavery was still legal, society believed at that time that blacks were a lesser race, and this was viewed as acceptable. Now if you had the mentality of that time today, surely you would be ostracized and labeled a bigot. But just under 200 years ago this was okay. I view the homosexuality matter in the same light, our society is now viewing equality as right and just as the morals of years past had not reached full maturity.

Again, the bible was written by men of a time where such teachings were appropriate... And I understand your desire to use this argument as a dish on the Constitution, but the wording is different and less restrictive in the constitution, and can more freely advance through time... Also the Constitution contains amendments so that it may be updated, the Bible does not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronin13

That's the beauty of the ideas passed on by Jefferson- he wasn't anti-religion, he simply said that one's religion is the business of that individual, not the state nor the church. That's kind of how I believe... We all choose to believe whatever we like, and I choose to believe, and acknowledge that the bible was still written by men. Men, who at the time thought it wrong to lay with another man, covet their neighbors wives (covet, not pursue), depictions of pornography (guilty here!), and many other things that are not viewed as bad these days. I look at the evolution of our society as a dictation of moral "good," this may sound liberal, but I do retain some limitations based on my morals and beliefs. Look at the 1820's... Slavery was still legal, society believed at that time that blacks were a lesser race, and this was viewed as acceptable. Now if you had the mentality of that time today, surely you would be ostracized and labeled a bigot. But just under 200 years ago this was okay. I view the homosexuality matter in the same light, our society is now viewing equality as right and just as the morals of years past had not reached full maturity.

Again, the bible was written by men of a time where such teachings were appropriate... And I understand your desire to use this argument as a dish on the Constitution, but the wording is different and less restrictive in the constitution, and can more freely advance through time... Also the Constitution contains amendments so that it may be updated, the Bible does not.

---

Yes, this does sound very liberal to me.

I base my moral values on the Word of God - Has not changed in over 2000 years.
I understand you base your moral values on logic and reason - Constantly changing.

I will stick with my baseline, and do my best to keep it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davsel

Is it safe to say the overwhelming majority of Colorado State Legislators who voted for Civil Unions, are the same ones who voted for gun restrictions?
And, the overwhelming majority of those that voted against Civil Unions, voted against gun restrictions?

Might be time to zero your compass.

---

+1