Dems want Colorado Red Flag Law

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Unsuccessful

Crap like this makes me feel like we have completely lost are once great state of Colorado. The fact that people can't see just how ignorant this idea of giving so much power to every single individual without any checks or balances boggles my mind. Is like taking advise from kids who eat tide pods.

---

You expressed my thoughts pretty much on-the-money.

Here are some examples of this being implemented in other states if anyone is interested in real cases, instead of theoretical scenarios.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/br...316-story.html

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.3926669

https://www.tallahassee.com/story/ne...uns/493898002/

http://www.valleyrecord.com/news/man...ch-is-charged/

https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...-McKenzie.html

This entire law will only create hundreds of situations similar to what Deputy Parrish faced on his last night on earth. Except some of those facing forcible gun confiscation will not be crazy, just ready. And it will only take one such incident to give the left all the ammo they need to declare all gun owners in Colorado as a risk to the state.


“Don’t go slow, be careful” Jedi

I have looked all over for the quote. I swear I thought it was "On War" by Clausewitz, or a Russian General. It was something like- there is a sign on the displays in the Paris Zoo that says "Warning- This animal is very dangerous! It will defend itself vigorously if provoked."

The whole Progressive gun grabbing plan is based on two things: One is that none of this costs them anything- in convenience or in dollars from the budget. The other is that it is meant to provoke us. The reverse idea that we only need guns to protect ourselves from the govt when the govt is coming for our guns is lost on them.

They are trying to start a civil war, or more precisely, a French Revolution type conflict.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Irving

Here are some examples of this being implemented in other states if anyone is interested in real cases, instead of theoretical scenarios.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/br...316-story.html

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.3926669

https://www.tallahassee.com/story/ne...uns/493898002/

http://www.valleyrecord.com/news/man...ch-is-charged/

https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...-McKenzie.html

---

We all know the establishment media is corrupt and we know they're going to float the establishment agenda on everything from gun control to globalism and everything else. Do you honestly believe they will report on all the abuses of these unconstitutional laws? Of course they're not going to report on that because they have an agenda of gun control and they will try to portray this as huge success to the unsuspecting public who don't understand that what they are reading is propaganda BS.

Haha, oh my gosh.

What part of "shall not be infringed" do some people not understand?

There are plenty of unconstitutional laws on the books already to "protect" without adding another

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by foxtrot

I've been thinking about this and the "red flag" EPRO could be used as advanced level "swatting" in two ways:

1) From departments receiving the ex-parte red-flag order that portrays you as a mass shooter, unaware of the system these orders are issued, doing no-knock raids on law abiding people. [You think it was a hostile forcible entry] putting your life in great jeopardy, and again, the LEO agency would probably be immune from liability if they kill you [they lawfully acted under the order and had to presume a threat]

---

The only reason to own or want to own an "assault weapon" is if you're a mass shooter, so if you own one, or are on this site, you need a red flag stat! It's for the kids.

My initial thought was that its time to scrape the NRA and other gun related stickers off my car because an obnoxious leftist behind me in traffic might just decide he's justified in ruining the lives of anyone that owns a gun out of spite.

And I realized THAT is the purpose of these laws, to push gun owners into the shadows for fear of being turned in and turned upside down by total strangers for no reason.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MOLON LABE

This entire law will only create hundreds of situations similar to what Deputy Parrish faced on his last night on earth. Except some of those facing forcible gun confiscation will not be crazy, just ready. And it will only take one such incident to give the left all the ammo they need to declare all gun owners in Colorado as a risk to the state.


“Don’t go slow, be careful” Jedi

---

The wife and I were discussing this the other day. LEOs coming to seize someone's natural right to self-preservation/guns might just be enough to push someone over the edge. Yet, Sheriff Tony Spurlock wants to prevent these types of encounters?

It's just a hypothetical, but it also isn't from the realm of fantasy.

Sent from my electronic leash using Tapatalk