Kezlowoski just got into Danica's REAR.
Printable View
Kezlowoski just got into Danica's REAR.
poor fat tony just ate it
the publicity stunt won't be too happy with the boyfriend creaming her
Wonder if she was yelling GO DADDY!
I think Jeff Gordan might have gotten into someone's rear a time or two.
NASCAR? Pfft. Real racing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNyxBm6dvZ4
Was it odd that he accelerated right before he it her.[oops] I guess he wanted to poke her a little harder. [LOL]
We understand but it is on TV. BTW those cars have doors and real race cars do not, just saying.... [Flower] http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/a...ldgroup155.jpgQuote:
NASCAR? Pfft. Real racing:
Those aren't even cars. They're just a roll cage with a fiberglass shell over the top of it. And le Mans style racing is on TV plenty.
The first couple minutes of this broadcast alone are why I love ALMS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lU1w6CMkNCQ
how real men race:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7TSXXm8m4k
Most interesting thing in NASCAR in a long time:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGD-jj6u8Uc
Our client. we maintain his trailer and fabricate race parts:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJJiIlXudYE
I like all forms of motorsport racing. Never really seen the purpose of the dick measuring discussion of this racing versus that kind. Its all good to me. NASCAR, F1, WRC, Tudor, SCCA club races, SCORE, whatever. About the only thing I don't like is NHRA drag racing
I thought they were gonna change the qualifying format this year? I hate the one at a time qualifying.
daytona qualifying is different--this just sets the front row. the rest of the field is set in the qualifying races on thursday
NO No no
THIS is real Racing...
http://vimeo.com/46856767
Negatory, THIS is racing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUHMkGacFD8
What does the SC in NASCAR stand for?
It is a shame what they turned the sport into.
National association of stock car auto racing ... or something like that ...
[LOL]
This thread became "THIS is the real racing"
hehe
Personally, I'd take crashing at 150mph a foot off the ground versus 250mph and 50 ft off the ground.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkwKqD9ylLo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShaNzOWvWiU
I Can't believe this guy lived ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y07yt87lhEA
Akin to that, my favorite race of the year, makes Daytona look freaking boring (because it is...)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTAaIGlVStY
Straight Line
http://youtu.be/hN57SzWhJFA
Spec comparison (incl circuit time)
> +22 sec slower on Moto GP
http://youtu.be/KsR4tr_QA4A
Sepang Circuit (Malaysian GP Circuit)
McLaren Mercedes F1 Driven by Jensen Button
~1:37
MotoGP 2:03
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN8oLNRpqMk
IF the bike had an equal power to weight ratio it might stand a chance LOL ... tho probably not with twice the contact patches with probably 10 times the surface area.. each.
but I'd like to see how an F1 car does on the TT course heh.
I stand corrected.. I thought the f1 cars had a much better power to weight ratio then motogp bikes.. they are about the same with some bikes even beating out the cars...
so it's all about downforce and contact patches.
Downforce sucking the car onto the track.
The old 1990's Indy Cars had enough downforce that they could drive on an inverted track at over 100mph and not fall off. I would imagine the modern F1 cars could beat that.
ETA: Found this; http://www.formula1.com/inside_f1/un...port/5281.html
Quote:
Several teams started to experiment with the now familiar wings in the late 1960s. Race car wings operate on exactly the same principle as aircraft wings, only in reverse. Air flows at different speeds over the two sides of the wing (by having to travel different distances over its contours) and this creates a difference in pressure, a physical rule known as Bernoulli's Principle. As this pressure tries to balance, the wing tries to move in the direction of the low pressure. Planes use their wings to create lift, race cars use theirs to create downforce. A modern Formula One car is capable of developing 3.5 g lateral cornering force (three and a half times its own weight) thanks to aerodynamic downforce. That means that, theoretically, at high speeds they could drive upside down.