I say this today that I-300 "the right to survive" was shot down at just over 81% against. I though all the liberals wanted to take care of the homeless. Apparently they don't want them to be able to camp on Denver owned areas.
I say this today that I-300 "the right to survive" was shot down at just over 81% against. I though all the liberals wanted to take care of the homeless. Apparently they don't want them to be able to camp on Denver owned areas.
But, when you need your next bag of shrooms, you can just head into town.
Who cares. Just because the people don?t want it doesn?t mean they won?t just implement it anyways.
Stupid peasants. If they aren?t smart enough to make the right decision then the king will do it for them.
I'm sure any disenfranchised campers in Denver can make their way to Boulder. Boulder has a camping ban yet under every bridge along Boulder Creek is a defacto homeless camp, complete with tents and chairs for them to lounge in. The homeless have trashed what could be a really attractive trout-filled creek running through town - trash everywhere, needles, empty food cans, discarded clothes from raided Goodwill bins, etc. Boulder simply will not enforce the ban.
They want to help them, they just don?t want them in their backyard.
Just like they want electric cars, but they don?t want to build power plants anywhere near where they live.
I would love to see a survey of what percentage of those "experiencing homelessness" (I fucking hate that expression) in the Front Range area were actually living in Colorado previously as honest citizens and fell on hard times- lost job, injured, medical expenses, lost home due landlord selling property, etc.
I am all for helping those people, but I feel that number would be very low, perhaps even single digits, and would be completely overwhelmed by the number of transients who came here for "legal weed" and the vagrant lifestyle facilitated by guilt-ridden, self-loathing liberals (like here in Boulder).
But, but,.... according to the Boulder County Commissioners, they passed a resolution:
As a community, Boulder County “explicitly welcomes all residents regardless of their age, race, ethnicity, country of origin, sexual preference of gender identity, ability, religion, income, political persuasion, or cultural practices,”
What? The dogs owner didn't take personal responsibility and pay for your treatment? Bah, don't be selfish and look at the bright side, at least the dog's owner can have shrooms. [Sarcasm2]
Sorry, dude. That had to suck in more ways than one. Yet another reason to avoid the liberal bastions.
The dog owner gave a fictitious address (probably didn't realize that some street numbers simply don't exist). As such, I suspect the rest of the info he gave the police was bogus as well. The police report shows that the police/animal-control wrote him a ticket that had multiple violations and it stated there was an "in-home quarantine" but I suspect that home is under one of the local bridges. Thankfully our insurance is covering all but $1K of the bill but even spending $1,000 on this event is not how I would have chosen to spend that money.
I think you're supposed to cut off the hippies head and test his brain.
Just to make sure.
[zombie1]
Wasn?t there a guy about fifteen or twenty years ago that was beheading homeless people in the Denver area?
Boulder Creek issues...
http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_315585...ks-cleanliness
Dammit, I was looking forward to shitting in the doorway of a certain building on Pearl St......
Canova said he’d be glad to see the cause furthered by professionals and officials with true expertise in the area, although he is glad that he came forward to provide added spark on the issue.
“Someone has got to light the fuse — and then run like hell the other way,” he said with a laugh.
I like this 80-year old's sense of humor