Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
So apparently the sanctuary city of Denver isn't so sanctuary.
I say this today that I-300 "the right to survive" was shot down at just over 81% against. I though all the liberals wanted to take care of the homeless. Apparently they don't want them to be able to camp on Denver owned areas.
But, when you need your next bag of shrooms, you can just head into town.
Who cares. Just because the people don?t want it doesn?t mean they won?t just implement it anyways.
Stupid peasants. If they aren?t smart enough to make the right decision then the king will do it for them.
Exactly....and FIFYOriginally Posted by ray1970
But, the rallying cry was, "We can do better"
Just follow Colorado Springs, "Hey homeless buddy, here's a bus ticket to Denver"
I'm sure any disenfranchised campers in Denver can make their way to Boulder. Boulder has a camping ban yet under every bridge along Boulder Creek is a defacto homeless camp, complete with tents and chairs for them to lounge in. The homeless have trashed what could be a really attractive trout-filled creek running through town - trash everywhere, needles, empty food cans, discarded clothes from raided Goodwill bins, etc. Boulder simply will not enforce the ban.
When I came over to your house, I saw a couple of hobos in town. Their sign didnt say "will work for food", "anything helps", "praise jesus", "single parent", or "hand me money". It said "we need a puppy".
Having just completed the ($19,000) rabies series of injections as a result of being bitten by a homeless person's dog, the LAST thing any of those bums needs is a puppy.
Last edited by hatidua; 05-10-2019 at 21:24.
That's lovely. I am sorry that happened to you. Did anything happen to the dog or its "owner"?
By law, the dog should have been quarantined for 10 days for the rabies concern alone.
My airstream has been stolen by dopers
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote