http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DL-a-r7iJIU
Dale Comstock - Certified American Badass posted this up on facebook this morning. See if you can make it all the way through the video before you have to walk out of the room.
Printable View
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DL-a-r7iJIU
Dale Comstock - Certified American Badass posted this up on facebook this morning. See if you can make it all the way through the video before you have to walk out of the room.
53% of America can watch this and understand why this country is so screwed and the other 47% watch this and doin't see a thing wrong with it.
I have a theory that our society has created these people by interrupting the natural selection process. Darwin no longer gets to harvest as he should.
This is why ALL social programs should be ended.
Cold, but I have to agree...Quote:
Originally Posted by buffalobo
That guy should be in jail for fraud.
thanks Judge Judy, i hope she actually sent it to congress
There is not one effing thing I could say that will not get me into trouble. This makes me sick, and I see this very attitude EVERY single day I work. I wonder who he voted for?
That gave me a warm fuzzy, glad I can make his life easier so he can just "Be himself".
[Wow2] just [Wow2] He probably gets a phone too.
Yup the problem is definitely the tax loopholes for the rich. Duh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nynco
Fixed that for you...
I made it a minute and 7 seconds into this before I had to go throw up.
I AM THE 53%
My mother always taught me if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.
That said, eff this guy and everyone like him, regardless of skin color.
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
-John Adams
Once people en masse abandon the Judeu-Christian morality our society used to be built upon the culture (and by extension the government) will descend into greed, avarice and sloth. And tyranny and slavery will be the end result.
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by dwalker460
For those that watched until the end, did you notice the plaintive didn't pay rent either?
BAM Judge Judy!
Filthy waste of space.
wow, you had to watch the whole video to get the full impact. We are done and finished as a nation. At least anything like what it used to be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronaldrwl
HAHA I didn't the first time, but went back and finished it just now. Hilarious! Judge Judy is right. "$70,000 right down the sewer!" The plaintiff was just as big of a crook too. WTF?!?
Yea, she wanted his free money too. Greed at it's finest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawin
I noticed that and was pretty disappointing that the judge let her emotions taint her court room ruling. The girl could have had a legitimate case against that guy. Here is how. If she and that idiot got a house together and he agreed to pay half the rent. What happens when he does not. Perhaps the girl did not have the money to cover the mooch. She then gets thrown out and the landlord sues her for back rent. She then sues the guy to get the money that he was supposed to use for rent. So she may not be as worthless as he is. We will never know because the judge lost her head.Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperiorDG
Dude, the judge asked if she paid rent. She said "No". End of case. If there were extenuating circumstances for that answer, then they would've been filed in the brief and the judge would've let her explain that. Obvisouly there was no excuse. The judge is briefed before the trial starts. The judge did not lose her head. She was sick of the morass and dismissed the case. Plantiff and Defendant are both useless moochers of society.Quote:
Originally Posted by nynco
I love Judge Judy. Someone should shoot those two.
Listen to what I am saying here. Yes she did not pay rent. The judge never asked why? If that is because the guy was supposed to pay half or all and she is now being sued by the landlord then there is a case for her to take against him so that she can then use that money to pay the landlord the settlement she owes. Like I said the Judge lost her head and dropped the ball. Or she could just be a worthless turd too I don't know. Just playin devils advocated.
I heard what you said friend. Please read what I wrote again. All the details are filed in the brief. Once the Plaintiff answered "no" and did not have any excuse as per the filed brief, there was no reason for the judge to ask "why". No reason to continue the case. There is no "why" to answer. (outside of being lazy or her using that money for something else, etc which none is covered under the law) You can find the whole episode online that will help fill in some of your other blanks and the contingencies of the case for you as well. Hope that helped.Quote:
Originally Posted by nynco
IF there WAS an excuse that she did not put in the brief... sorry, she can retry in another case as long as it fits certain criteria etc... which I'm not sure small claims, civil court will actually allow. Gotta read the paper work you fill out. Ignorance is no excuse.
I hear what you are saying, but still disagree. If the plaintiff had said, "Your honor, I was only able to pay my half of the rent for the month of X, Y & Z" That would have been different. It is only now that the landlord is coming after her, that she sues him... She was content to pay and felt she owed nothing until after the fact. I do not readily agree with the Judge's ruling, but can see her disgust in what the "system" has brought her.Quote:
Originally Posted by nynco
Well I might have a lot to learn about courts. I just look at TV courts as clown court. So who knows if there is even a brief.
And yes it did help. Not that she matters, but I try to learn anytime I can and hopefully never need to apply such lessons in life.
She paid no rent, and continued to live there for several months, now she is trying to recover money from her deadbeat roommate that she isn't actually out, so she can cover her own deadbeat ass.
^precisely.Quote:
Originally Posted by TFOGGER
So apparently Judge Judy never sent in the tape to congress or she did and they just ignored it.....................
How fast do you think that young man would revert to a life of crime if he didn't have tax payers money to work with???
I see that shit every once and awhile, I am resource coordinator for (unnamed) county for adult waiver services for those with developmental or intellectual disabilities.....90% of the time I work with those that definitely needs help and assistance, they don't ask for much other than the basics......................
..........then there is the 10%, mostly family that takes care of said person or said person lives with them and they ask for some pretty interesting things to get Medicaid Waiver to pay for.................. unfortunately cant really give details about anything, but imagine that guy in the video taking care of a family member that is on my caseload and you get the picture.
WTH? I see nothing wrong here....[Kick2]
Repost.
Wipes nose.
I'm guessing a certain segment of society doesn't give much thought to where the funds that make up their welfare check from from.... sad. And not sustainable forever.
From years ago too isn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Irving
Once she said "$22,000 for you to become a functional MUSICIAN" I laughed, hard, then I became saddened.
Why is that? Is it because you believe that spending money on an education in music is a waste of funds and an education? Or because you thought it was typical that a free-loader would choose such an education because it seemed easy to him? Or is it something else?Quote:
Originally Posted by stevelkinevil
Careful with this road... I AM a trained musician.... Ha ha!
They live all around us and they breed like flies. That turd gets handouts like that, and how freakin' much hell am I going to go through to get unemployment, maybe disability, maybe Social Security, after paying for that stuff all my adult working life for 42 friggin' years?
Know'nI'msayin'?
I really NEED a range day to put some holes in things......
Quote:
Originally Posted by nynco
Ok...so if he and her got a place to live and he had signed the rent then it is his responsibility to pay rent. If his name is not on the lease then he has no responsibility to pay the rent there. If his name isn't on the lease then he shouldn't be there, period. If she couldn't pay the rent by herself then she shouldn't have rented that place, period. If the landlord was suing the lease holder and its just her name and his is not then too bad for her.