Ted lays it out pretty well to Piers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkjIM...layer_embedded
Printable View
Ted lays it out pretty well to Piers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkjIM...layer_embedded
Do you think piers has armed guards?
Blow hard Morgan is getting all kinds of press, good or bad, he's getting what he wants with all these debates. Although from the debates that I've seen, Morgan has had his butt handed to him more times than not, including this one with Nuge.
But what I want to know, is what gun shop has anyone been in recently that had that much inventory on the walls, lately?
I'm glad Ted called Piers on never changing his mind. That tool has his mind set and regardless of how well Ted lays down the facts it will never change. Hopefully the public will see the truth in what Ted had to say and start to see the light.
The other problem that I have when polls are quoted concerning support for gun control is that I don't give a shit about majority support to disarm America. This isn't a right given by people or the constitution and it can't be taken away. Damn sheep don't get that though.
I'm so tired of that foreigner telling people how to think. That sumbitch needs to go back to England where he belongs.
That was an interesting video. Ted held it together well even when that [ahole] kept interrupting him. No wonder Jeremy Clarkson from Top Gear popped him.
God bless Ted! He is awesome. And Musashi- did you hear what Clarkson said about Piers? "We spent 40 years trying to get rid of Piers. America, please don't send him back!" [LOL]
I did hear what Clarkson said. The guy is a pompous fool at times (must be a British thing [Neene1] ) - Clarkson that is, but I love him and they way he calls it. He always feels free to express his opinion without repercussions. Like it should be.
I'm about sick of Peirs and his rapid fire don't let you answer or reply to his questions / statements...
he'll ask a question then before the other party has a chance to reply pounds on 2-3 bullshit statements that are not even part of his question .
I could never be in the same room as that prick with out reaching out and slapping him in the back of the head while saying STFU .
Two pukes on the same show! Amazing how anyone can look up to these two tools..........
is there a clip of it?
If you noticed the polls (for support of stricter laws) fell from 4-9 points in a month. Maybe as more facts "come out" people are seeing that these new restrictions will do nothing to curtail the problem and only infringe on law-abiding citizens.
That's why the left wants to act as rapidly as possible. They want to capitalize on the emotion and fear. They have no facts to justify their agenda.
http://youtu.be/vfzu2ObrYzc
While I generally agree, Polls as evidence are about as good as a screen door on a submarine. They're only as good as what they are made of. When they say such and such number of Americans are for this or that it's completely subject to whom they decide to poll. They could poll in the center of DC, or NYC, or San Francisco and get their number on that stuff, and I can conduct the exact same poll in rural TX, ID, MT, CO, UT, ect and get numbers completely different.
I'm sure this is 100% obvious to everyone here, but I was just about screaming at the screen for Ted to throw that right back in his face, or at least ask "Who are you polling specifically?"
Fortunately, Piers Morgan won't be on the air much longer. This is what he's stooped to as a device to get his ratings out of the toilet. It isn't working.
Polls can be written in a way to elicit a desired outcome. National feelings or opinions don't nullify the Constitution. If so much of the country is in favor of changing the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, Article V spells out the process;
If it's such an overwhelming majority that want the law changed, it should be easy to find 38 states willing to make the change.Quote:
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article*; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
Way to go Ted! Peirs is a DB!
[bad-banana]
Uncle Ted [rules]!!!!!!!!!!