Printable View
An Arapahoe county judge has cleared the way for Holmes to be "interviewed" under narcotics. "We have ways to make you talk".. WTF is next? Magazine limits, prohibitions of private transactions between individuals? I ain`t feelin` real secure right now.. What the fuck is next?
Interrogated under drugs? Where's his 5th Amendment rights (along with many others)?
Did you just hear that tearing sound? That was more of the Constitution getting shredded!
Is this something requested by his defense attorney's? Something's seriously not right here.
I despise this guy as much as the next, but the prisoner has rights!
silence peasant.
I pulled you over today sir because I observed a COAR-15 decal on the rear window of your SUV. I need to ask you if you have any rifle or pistol magazines that will hold over 7 rounds. No, are you sure sir? Mind if I search your vehicle? I don't need a warrant sir. As you should know, under the DHS Security Act of 2014 and as a member of the National Homeland Security Forces I can search your vehicle on the suspicion that you may have illegal firearms or firearms paraphernalia. Sir, if you refuse to let me search your vehicle I will be forced to incapacitate you by force for my safety and you will be charged with resisting the lawful orders of an Security Officer as outlined in the DHS Security Act of 2014 as provided by UN Resolution 1224 establishing the NHSF as a lawful force to keep the country safe from people that fail to obey the laws of international treaty.
Thank you sir for your cooperation, please step out of the vehicle and clasp your hands behind your neck. I am going to handcuff you to my vehicle for my safety while I carry out my duties. No sir, you may not call your wife. I have notified my command center and a team will arrive at your home to search for illegal firearms and related contraband. Please do not be alarmed, your family members will be secured safely while officers search your home.
Thank you again for your cooperation, sir. This should not take long once the search team gets here to inspect your vehicle. Sir, I understand your objections to my search of your vehicle and as a UN and DHS NHSF officer I am not under the authority of the United States or it's Constitution and if you continue to protest my actions you will be charged with distracting an officer while in the performance of his duty which is a class 1 felony and you will be sent to an education center for a period of not less than 6 months nor more than 18 months provided that you are deemed eligible to reenter society. No sir there will not be a trial, the regulations that you will be held on carry the force of law as per UN Resolution 1229 as passed and ratified by the untied States Congress in 2014.
Sir, you have been apprised of the penalties which may assessed against you and your family if you do not cooperate with my lawful commands.
SO STAND THERE AND SHUT THE FUCK UP!!
UN Resolution 1224 regards the Sahara region and 1229 regards Angola.Quote:
Originally Posted by wctriumph
I think he was making a joke and just used random numbers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint45
At what point durning that stop do I take any and all means necessary to put a stop to unlawful search and seizer?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wctriumph
You are allowed to refuse to comply with a request to search your vehicle if you are not being detained. If the officer says the magic words "you are detained" or "you are under arrest" and you drive from the scene, I believe that constitutes felony evasion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooskibar03
I was thinking more "Crash, Flash, Bang!"
poor Colorado...
Source? I can't find anything on this.
If his defense team decides to use an insanity plea, the prosecution has a right to have him evaluated by a psychiatrist of their choice to determine the validity of the plea. The judge is ruling that he can be given meds in order to regulate himself in order to be able to be evaluated. If the boy is/was insane at the time of the offense and cannot assist in his defense, then the insanity plea will stand.Quote:
Originally Posted by theGinsue
Lighten up, D-u-u-u-d-e! Mellow Out !Quote:
Originally Posted by mdflem51
To make everything better, we've legalized marijuana in CO, so you can LITERALLY forget all your troubles. [BooHoo]
It is all part of our Safety package for the citizens of CO.
More restrictive gun bills and legalizing Federally Controlled Substances is making the citizens of Colorado MUCH MORE Safer.Is das nicht rightig ?I mean, isn't that correct ?
http://i431.photobucket.com/albums/q...th_sarcasm.gif
But some nameless AM talk radio buffoon said it on the air, so it MUST BE TRUE!Quote:
Originally Posted by J
can we call this domestic terrorism and just turn him over to the feds so they can make him disappear, and then we can visit him in a few years when they round us all up because we posted on an internet forum [Flower][panic]
Fuck him. If he wants to plead insanity, let them do whatever. Someone should have shot him that night anyway.
Saw it on the local TV news just a few minutes ago. I understand what OneGuy is saying, but it's still wrong to subdue someone mentally by drugs for the purpose of interviewing/interrogating.Quote:
Originally Posted by J
Where do you draw the line? What happens when it's YOU or a family member they're doing this to for a non-murder charge just to be able to get more information? This is a violation of Civil Rights, nothing less. Once the line is crossed even one time, it opens the door to being able to do it for so many more things.Quote:
Originally Posted by mtnhack
I couldn't agree more, We've all just been dealt a blow that is the direct result of the slippery slope of letting the door open a crack, and people think this isnt' a bad thing?????Quote:
Originally Posted by theGinsue
This is okay, but water boarding a suspected terrorist isn't? Damn liberal-logic.
Here is the exception for him. He was caught red-handed, has confessed and is now trying to use the insanity plea. If he were not trying to plead insanity, this would be a non-issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by theGinsue
The order states "to ensure lucidity". There is probably some bs 25 page document on the administration of the drugs, and another 25 pages on the definition of lucidity to which none of this is addressed in the article.
What would you recommend them do with this or any nutjob?
Ginsuey,
This isn't the first time this has occurred, where a judge had made the determination to medicate a suspect. It isn't an interrogation that is going to be conducted; it is a series of interviews by a medical doctor specializing in psychiatry, who will be involved. The questions being asked aren't going to be concerning guilt or innocence, it is going to be whether or not he is or was insane. If he is or was insane at the time, then ethically, the prosecution cannot go forward with a prosecution of him as he did not have the mens rea to be responsible for the crimes.