For those of you on FB...

[DFBrews]

My girlfriends mom and partner grabbed it off mine and replaced their standard bars with the ar 15 one

[mahabali]

[tmleadr03]

The government has no place in any marriage. Either in hetero or homo relations. Not the business of the government.

[Hitman 6]

Stolen and shared. Thanks.

[Teufelhund]

FFS this one drives me nuts. The phrase is "couldn't care less." "I could care less" implies that you do actually care.

[cfortune]

Profile picture changed. You should feel honored. This is the only time I've changed mine since I signed up for FB (about 6 years ago).

[Rooskibar03]

Stolen from a friend who has much better writing skills then I do.


Interesting how 26 States voted against Obamacare but we got stuck with it through legislation, but that's another story. Now 32 times since 1998, voters have gone to the polls and voted against gay marriage, yet we have the Supreme Court making a decision on it instead. Do you not see what is happening here? It's not a matter of gay marriage, it's a matter of the progressive liberal agenda always losing at the ballot box so instead they try to ram through legislation and take the power out of the hands of the people and put it in the hands of bureaucrats with an agenda. You go from millions of people voting as was intended, to letting 9 Judges give a decision.


Do not ever forget that Obama was AGAINST same-sex marriage in 2008 prior to getting elected so he could get a conservative demographic to give him a chance which many did. 4 years later he had lost that base for a myriad of reasons, so instead he panders to other interest groups whether its gays, illegal immigrants, gun control, welfare, etc...


Bottom line, they don't care about Gays, they care about the votes, thats it, if you believe otherwise you are sadly mistaken. This is where I have a problem with one- issue voters. Obama says he is now for gay marriage so gay marriage supporters vote for him. They don't care about his character or integrity in the matter, or that it's plainly obviously he was against it for a reason, they only care that he is giving them what they want now. It's almost greedy. Why? Because until gay people in this country start standing up for gay people in the Middle East who get hung or stoned to death I have no tolerance or time for their demands, go use your freedom here to go help them there. You already live in a free country and can do as you please. What about them? Are you not for the same cause or only if its within your borders?


If gay marriage went to a national vote and it passed, then I have no issue with it; I have no issue with gays, I have good friends who are, but when your cause keeps losing then you try to find new ways to play the game, that is where I have a problem. My guess is that it would get hammered down in a national vote just like the 32 times states have voted it down.

[Teufelhund]

Stolen from a friend who has much better writing skills then I do.


Interesting how 26 States voted against Obamacare but we got stuck with it through legislation, but that's another story. Now 32 times since 1998, voters have gone to the polls and voted against gay marriage, yet we have the Supreme Court making a decision on it instead. Do you not see what is happening here? It's not a matter of gay marriage, it's a matter of the progressive liberal agenda always losing at the ballot box so instead they try to ram through legislation and take the power out of the hands of the people and put it in the hands of bureaucrats with an agenda. You go from millions of people voting as was intended, to letting 9 Judges give a decision.


Do not ever forget that Obama was AGAINST same-sex marriage in 2008 prior to getting elected so he could get a conservative demographic to give him a chance which many did. 4 years later he had lost that base for a myriad of reasons, so instead he panders to other interest groups whether its gays, illegal immigrants, gun control, welfare, etc...


Bottom line, they don't care about Gays, they care about the votes, thats it, if you believe otherwise you are sadly mistaken. This is where I have a problem with one- issue voters. Obama says he is now for gay marriage so gay marriage supporters vote for him. They don't care about his character or integrity in the matter, or that it's plainly obviously he was against it for a reason, they only care that he is giving them what they want now. It's almost greedy. Why? Because until gay people in this country start standing up for gay people in the Middle East who get hung or stoned to death I have no tolerance or time for their demands, go use your freedom here to go help them there. You already live in a free country and can do as you please. What about them? Are you not for the same cause or only if its within your borders?


If gay marriage went to a national vote and it passed, then I have no issue with it; I have no issue with gays, I have good friends who are, but when your cause keeps losing then you try to find new ways to play the game, that is where I have a problem. My guess is that it would get hammered down in a national vote just like the 32 times states have voted it down.

Replace "gay marriage" in this specific rant with "gun ownership" and maybe you'll see the hypocrisy. America is not a democracy, even for issues you oppose.

[Rooskibar03]

Replace "gay marriage" in this specific rant with "gun ownership" and maybe you'll see the hypocrisy. America is not a democracy, even for issues you oppose.

Seeing as how there is no mention of marriage in the Consitition and no power given to the ffederal government regarding the topic, I don't see how the two are connected.

[theGinsue]

Gonna steal both those images... thanks, fellas.

Me too. I added this commentary to go with them:

With all of the FaceBook posting identifying peoples position on gay marriages, I'm posting to identify my position on an issue actually covered by the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution. LEAVE OUR CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS ALONE!