UN Treaty?

[Richard K]

Constitution fundamentals:



The President may enter the United States into treaties, but they are not effective until ratified by a two-thirds vote in the Senate.

If we entered into the treaty, consider the loss of ALL eastern block (Priv, Wolf, Tula, etc), Korean (PMC) and asian (Paki, Indian) and other foreign ammo.

You think prices are bad now? You aint seen nothing yet.

Galaxy Note II + Tapatalk 2

Thanks for the clarification. Yes, ammo prices would soar but I am more concerned about mandatory registration and the potential for future confiscation of all firearms

[Rooskibar03]

Thanks for the clarification. Yes, ammo prices would soar but I am more concerned about mandatory registration and the potential for future confiscation of all firearms

Yup.

Each country will be obligated to “maintain a national control list that shall include [rifles and handguns]” and "to regulate brokering taking place under its jurisdiction for conventional arms.”

[spqrzilla]

As mentioned, Treaties that the executive has signed but the Senate has not ratified have no effect. Witness the Kyoto treaty that Clinton signed and never even presented to the Senate.

Also treaties cannot contradict the Constitution.

[brokenscout]

Nothing would surprise me anymore