The Supreme asshole threatens again to use EO

[BPTactical]

And the above leave Biden and Pelosi in power.
No thanks

[sabot_round]

And the above leave Biden and Pelosi in power.
No thanks

Good point!! Trading idiots with bigger retards will not be wise.

[Slapps74]

Biden wouldn't make it two weeks in office before he had a meltdown.

[sniper7]

Biden wouldn't make it two weeks in office before he had a meltdown.

At least he could blast his shotgun off the white house lawn

[motohooligan]

with teeth.

[Aloha_Shooter]

And the above leave Biden and Pelosi in power.
No thanks

I think that's the whole point in having Biden as his VP. It's not like the guy actually brings anything to the table.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Yet no one has the testicular fortitude to do anything about it!

Just what do you propose anyone do about it? He's taking a page out of Andrew Jackson's book but really -- while Congress has the power of appropriations, the President DOES have the ability to redirect some current year spending without Congressional approval. The amount he's talking about exceeds that authority but all Congress can do is file a lawsuit that won't even come to trial for a couple of years (or so) while they tussle over Executive Privilege and whether it protects documents that record his intentions to circumvent the law. Impeach the bastage for maladministration? Dream on, Nancy Pelosi can block any impeachment motion and even if it DID make it out of the House (and believe me, the Dems would use and misrepresent it every which way as "racially motivated" in the 2014 elections), Harry Reid can get his acquittal 15 minutes after blocking all testimony and demanding a floor vote.

If you want to be effective at anything, you've got to get the vast majority of the public aware of this BS. Unfortunately, there's a large segment -- including people on this board -- who blame the Republicans first for anything (which ironically is similar to Obama's predilection for blaming America first for anything).

[Ronin13]

Just what do you propose anyone do about it?

I would think he is able to be arrested for abuse of power, failure to fulfill the oath of office, and going against the Constitution. Articles of impeachment may be hard to achieve, but one would think that there are other ways (I honestly don't know, other than military leaders placing him under arrest, but wouldn't that constitute a coup?). I mean, c'mon, they impeached Clinton for a BJ, this makes that look like.. well, a BJ.

[losttrail]

"Safe gun ownership" in Marxist-Muslim Obama terms is:

All guns owned by private citizens are confiscated and destroyed. The only relationship between guns and citizens would be:

1. For the citizens to view what they once owned in a museum. Maybe. Probably not.

2. For citizens to stare down the muzzle end of guns held by the police state (DHS).

[losttrail]

I would think he is able to be arrested for abuse of power, failure to fulfill the oath of office, and going against the Constitution. Articles of impeachment may be hard to achieve, but one would think that there are other ways (I honestly don't know, other than military leaders placing him under arrest, but wouldn't that constitute a coup?). I mean, c'mon, they impeached Clinton for a BJ, this makes that look like.. well, a BJ.

No, they impeached Clinton for perjury. Lying about a BJ.