Any Attorneys out there?

[spqrzilla]

foxtrot, if you think that law schools limit enrollment, you are simply a clown. Granted one with a foul mouth, but a clown.

[spqrzilla]

Paul Campos writes on the topic of how law schools graduate more lawyers than the industry can absorb last year.

[Ronin13]

Irving....

Is spqrzilla an attorney, or are you being sarcastic?

[Great-Kazoo]

Irving....

Is spqrzilla an attorney, or are you being sarcastic?

No he's not. Some like to keep a Low Profile.

FWIW: There are an easy 1/2 + dozen LE's here too. You want me to out them for ya?

[Jeffrey Lebowski]

Ditto. Once someone sees or knows of a law being broken, you have the potential to be an accessory before the fact. With knowledge of a crime but failed to report it. Some of the shit i read on line i change the page asap.

Why? Once it is downloaded to your browser, it isn't like there is a timer on it. You saw some random knuckleheads spouting on the internet. You have no responsibility to anyone. What am I missing?

[Ronin13]

No he's not. Some like to keep a Low Profile.

FWIW: There are an easy 1/2 + dozen LE's here too. You want me to out them for ya?

I see what you did there...

Why? Once it is downloaded to your browser, it isn't like there is a timer on it. You saw some random knuckleheads spouting on the internet. You have no responsibility to anyone. What am I missing?

Dude, it's on the internet, you mean it's not true?

[Great-Kazoo]

Why? Once it is downloaded to your browser, it isn't like there is a timer on it. You saw some random knuckleheads spouting on the internet. You have no responsibility to anyone. What am I missing?

Knowledge of a Potential Crime.
There was a person who lent their vehicle to another person. That person "had an idea" the borrower of said car was going to commit a crime. next day investigators trace owner of car and inform them their car was used in a crime. Deny, Deny, Deny, UNTIL the owner was told it was used in commission of a murder. AND as their vehicle was used they are now looking at the death penalty.
WAIT IT GETS BETTER












SINCE LIKE AN IDIOT. The Owner, tweaker she was, had told the investigators she "Thought" they were going to rob someone AND asked her if they could use her car!. Stupid cunt THOUGHT???
Knowledge of a crime prior to or after and "covering it up or Not contacting LE" about it, put them along side the ones who offed a family member. They might as well have been there with them. Granted that is CA and all of them rolled on each other, faster than Bloomberg writing checks.

REMEMBER HERE IN CO on the side of utility trucks EYES AND EARS. !@#$%^ they even have pictures of an Eye & Ear for those less fluent in ENGLISH.
SEE IT, REPORT IT.

[Jeffrey Lebowski]

Dude, it's on the internet, you mean it's not true?

Comment ça va?

[Jeffrey Lebowski]

Knowledge of a Potential Crime.
There was a person who lent their vehicle to another person. That person "had an idea" the borrower of said car was going to commit a crime. next day investigators trace owner of car and inform them their car was used in a crime. Deny, Deny, Deny, UNTIL the owner was told it was used in commission of a murder. AND as their vehicle was used they are now looking at the death penalty.
WAIT IT GETS BETTER

SINCE LIKE AN IDIOT. The Owner, tweaker she was, had told the investigators she "Thought" they were going to rob someone AND asked her if they could use her car!. Stupid cunt THOUGHT???
Knowledge of a crime prior to or after and "covering it up or Not contacting LE" about it, put them along side the ones who offed a family member. They might as well have been there with them. Granted that is CA and all of them rolled on each other, faster than Bloomberg writing checks.

REMEMBER HERE IN CO on the side of utility trucks EYES AND EARS. !@#$%^ they even have pictures of an Eye & Ear for those less fluent in ENGLISH.
SEE IT, REPORT IT.

I'm following you on owner/tweaker and the borrower. I'm still not with you on how this impacts you the third party drive-by internet surfer, assuming you are neither one. (?)

So, this little back and forth is going on, online, on a website you may be surfing. Let's say through discovery I get the data logs that said you downloaded the page. How do I prove whether you actually read it or not?
Unless you are commenting directly on the activity in question, I don't. I'm betting everyone here surfs multiple forums multiple times a day. I'm also betting most folks don't read every word of every thread. I sure as hell don't, but my browser would show that I looked at a lot of threads. In fact, I'm in and out of a lot of threads in about 2 sentences if it doesn't capture my attention. So they are going to prosecute everyone who may or may not have seen said discussion online?

Even if you genuinely read it thoroughly, do you know the folks to report or are they largely anonymous to you?
Likewise, can you be expected to report every troll you come across? Of course not, so even if genuinely interested how do you know it isn't that?

[Great-Kazoo]

I'm following you on owner/tweaker and the borrower. I'm still not with you on how this impacts you the third party drive-by internet surfer, assuming you are neither one. (?)

So, this little back and forth is going on, online, on a website you may be surfing. Let's say through discovery I get the data logs that said you downloaded the page. How do I prove whether you actually read it or not?
Unless you are commenting directly on the activity in question, I don't. I'm betting everyone here surfs multiple forums multiple times a day. I'm also betting most folks don't read every word of every thread. I sure as hell don't, but my browser would show that I looked at a lot of threads. In fact, I'm in and out of a lot of threads in about 2 sentences if it doesn't capture my attention. So they are going to prosecute everyone who may or may not have seen said discussion online?

Even if you genuinely read it thoroughly, do you know the folks to report or are they largely anonymous to you?
Likewise, can you be expected to report every troll you come across? Of course not, so even if genuinely interested how do you know it isn't that?

Prosecute No, intimidate, threaten them, their family and "mention CPS" if they have kids. Shit there are some board members here who would fold over a parking ticket, let alone mention of a federal indictment.

The mods were busy at one point reining in the "ramblings". and rightly so.

You get someone who is a member of any gun forum especially a newer member (like you for instance) who does a McVeigh and bet your house payment, the feds will fine comb each and every post and who replied and or "viewed" said post.
What's that saying? CONSPIRACY .................WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY.
After OKC, ANY person with ties to a " militia" forum was contacted by the feds. The guys who were on Boyles radio show were "visited / contacted" numerous times by the feds.