1224 and selling to non-restricted states?

[BlasterBob]

The following is a post I made on May 21st and received not one comment. I'm starting to believe that when anyone sees a BlasterBob post, they just ignore it thinking that the OLD bastard is just making another idle post. Anyhow, here's what I posted:

This is wording in the CO AG's Technical Guidance letter:
"However, the bill prohibits the owner of a large-capacity magazine from selling or transferring it after July 1, 2013" and he goes on and on ------.
The way this is worded, he makes it sound like we cannot ever sell these hi-cap mags to ANYONE after July 1, 2013, even if they are taken it out of the great State of CO to be sold in some other State that still allows possession of them. That's the way it is worded or at least the way I interpret it although there would be no way in hell that they could enforce our not being able to sell them outside of CO.
Looks like our wonderful AG will have to add a few words to his "letter of guidance"

Now, sure hope this is not considered a REPOST!!!!!!

[Jeep297]

The following is a post I made on May 21st and received not one comment. I'm starting to believe that when anyone sees a BlasterBob post, they just ignore it thinking that the OLD bastard is just making another idle post. Anyhow, here's what I posted:

This is wording in the CO AG's Technical Guidance letter:
"However, the bill prohibits the owner of a large-capacity magazine from selling or transferring it after July 1, 2013" and he goes on and on ------.
The way this is worded, he makes it sound like we cannot ever sell these hi-cap mags to ANYONE after July 1, 2013, even if they are taken it out of the great State of CO to be sold in some other State that still allows possession of them. That's the way it is worded or at least the way I interpret it although there would be no way in hell that they could enforce our not being able to sell them outside of CO.
Looks like our wonderful AG will have to add a few words to his "letter of guidance"

Now, sure hope this is not considered a REPOST!!!!!!

This is exactly what I'm talking about. The way it's written seems to imply that after July 1st one is not legally able to sell their 15+ round magazines, even to someone out of state where it is legal to own. When you look at the restrictions on removable floor plates (readily convertible), the "continuos possession" section, the arbitrary limits on capacity, and the seemingly inability to sell out of state, it's blatantly obvious this legislation is aimed at law abiding citizens, not criminals (as if that was ever in question for us). I'm so sick of this shit, wake the hell up America! If we can't turn this around by 2014 I may have to sadly leave this state I have so proudly called home for the last 8 years

[Jeffrey Lebowski]

The way this is worded, he makes it sound like we cannot ever sell these hi-cap mags to ANYONE after July 1, 2013, even if they are taken it out of the great State of CO to be sold in some other State that still allows possession of them. That's the way it is worded or at least the way I interpret it although there would be no way in hell that they could enforce our not being able to sell them outside of CO.

What you are ultimately saying is that a person must follow the laws of their state of residence even when they are in another state.
The reason there is no way to enforce it is because their jurisdiction ends at the state boundary.
Would you smoke pot in a state where you'd like to sell your magazines (assuming it isn't WA)?
Would you try out your CCW in downtown Chicago or DC?

[BlasterBob]

What you are ultimately saying is that a person must follow the laws of their state of residence even when they are in another state.

No no no, I am not saying that. Our illustrious AG has worded it that way in his guidance letter. I sure as hell do NOT go along with the wording he is using.