1224 and magazine extensions for mags that were already >15 capacity

[Great-Kazoo]

1) Can mags be legally transferred into a trust after June 30th?
2) I plan to just post pictures of everything I have in the picture thread and have my defense attorney subpoena every member of this site to the trial.

Why not? you own then do what ever you want as long as they are "in your possession" My question (AGAIN) is who knows what you own, are in possession etc etc?? UNLESS the mags have a post 6/30 date stamp / ID on them they were always in your possession. ALWAYS in your family's Possession. EVERY firearm within my reach is also owned by my spouse, daughter and numerous other family members.
Take me to court and prove, Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, they were not.

Like a firearm purchased ( 4473 purchase) before or after 7/1 You can transfer them LEGALLY as a "Gift" to your trust. This enables anyone you include in the trust, as owners until that ownership / possession is rescinded.

The less you post on line, the less Can and Will be Used against you In a Court of Law.

In laymen's term's SHUT UP, BE QUIET Stop Posting about it.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Why not? you own then do what ever you want as long as they are "in your possession" My question (AGAIN) is who knows what you own, are in possession etc etc?? UNLESS the mags have a post 6/30 date stamp / ID on them they were always in your possession. ALWAYS in your family's Possession. EVERY firearm within my reach is also owned by my spouse, daughter and numerous other family members.
Take me to court and prove, Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, they were not.

Like a firearm purchased ( 4473 purchase) before or after 7/1 You can transfer them LEGALLY as a "Gift" to your trust. This enables anyone you include in the trust, as owners until that ownership / possession is rescinded.

The less you post on line, the less Can and Will be Used against you In a Court of Law.

In laymen's term's SHUT UP, BE QUIET Stop Posting about it.

I think his concern is that the whole point of the trust is that it is legally another entity so there's a transfer of ownership (prohibited by stupid poorly-written law) even when possession remains the same. That's yet another example of how poorly written the laws are so I understand why he's asking.

Your other points about the prosecutor having the burden to prove a transgression and just shutting up are valid.

[Irving]

I think his concern is that the whole point of the trust is that it is legally another entity so there's a transfer of ownership (prohibited by stupid poorly-written law) even when possession remains the same. That's yet another example of how poorly written the laws are so I understand why he's asking.

Your other points about the prosecutor having the burden to prove a transgression and just shutting up are valid.

Yes exactly, thank you. The second part of my post was facetious.