Friend walked in on a burglary.

[brutal]

I'm Cameron, I would have thought that was obvious. Let me ask again.

You have made the assertion that knowledge of LE notification in a burglary some how invalidates Colorado state law in regard to the protection of an occupant or home owner, specifically in regard to the use of force. Do you have ANY case law that backs up your premise? Or are you just talking out of your ass?

Cameron

Now you're talking out of your ass. There's nothing in the statute that says "home owner." What part of OCCUPANT don't you understand?

[JM Ver. 2.0]

Now you're talking out of your ass. There's nothing in the statute that says "home owner." What part of OCCUPANT don't you understand?

Don't steal my thunder.

[brutal]

Don't steal my thunder.

That's what I get for trying to post while on a conference call. I hate it when work distracts me from the important things.

[JM Ver. 2.0]

That's what I get for trying to post while on a conference call. I hate it when work distracts me from the important things.

Least we're on the same page...

[Cameron]

You have made the assertion that knowledge of LE notification in a burglary, or that you enter your premise after the intruder, it some how invalidates Colorado state law in regard to the protection of an occupant, specifically in regard to the use of force. Do you have ANY case law that backs up your premise? Or are you just talking out of your ass?

Cameron

[JM Ver. 2.0]

You have made the assertion that knowledge of LE notification in a burglary, or that you enter your premise after the intruder, it some how invalidates Colorado state law in regard to the protection of an occupant, specifically in regard to the use of force. Do you have ANY case law that backs up your premise? Or are you just talking out of your ass?

Cameron

I'm going to assume it hasn't happened yet... But, why don't you give it a try and we'll use your case as case law?

Or has our logic somehow made you rethink wanting to be the test case?