Close
Results 1 to 10 of 220

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Grand Master Know It All funkymonkey1111's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Englewood
    Posts
    2,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0 View Post
    Yes. But in every part of the law the word used is OCCUPANT. See below.

    Because you were not an occupant when they broke in, and made yourself an occupant AFTER you KNEW there could be a danger and that the police were en route, you're no longer protected under the law.

    The key word is OCCUPANT.



    Because you were not an occupant at the given time, and you were aware a danger could be present, you have no protection under the law.

    I'm done now.

    Cameron, I'm sorry I didn't stoop to your level of name calling and actually gave you something logical. Your blatant attempt at baiting me into a confrontation by name calling was pretty childish. Sorry it didn't work.
    You seem to like to omit the words that disagree with your position. Here, it's "or." Your definition of occupant states "A person who resides or is present in a house....." In this case, the homeowner is always the occupant of the home. The use of the term "occupant" in the statute includes all who have the right to be in the home--a renter, a child that doesn't own the home, etc. -- so the right to defend one's self in the home is independent of ownership. You do not cease being an occupant of the home simply because you leave to go to work.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by funkymonkey1111 View Post
    You seem to like to omit the words that disagree with your position. Here, it's "or." Your definition of occupant states "A person who resides or is present in a house....." In this case, the homeowner is always the occupant of the home. The use of the term "occupant" in the statute includes all who have the right to be in the home--a renter, a child that doesn't own the home, etc. -- so the right to defend one's self in the home is independent of ownership. You do not cease being an occupant of the home simply because you leave to go to work.
    If you want to go that route...

    A landlord/homeowner is always an occupant. Therefor, they can make entry into the home you rent from them... Whenever they want... With or without your permission... Ya know, because they're the homeowner.

    Would you like that?

  3. #3
    Grand Master Know It All funkymonkey1111's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Englewood
    Posts
    2,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0 View Post
    If you want to go that route...

    A landlord/homeowner is always an occupant. Therefor, they can make entry into the home you rent from them... Whenever they want... With or without your permission... Ya know, because they're the homeowner.

    Would you like that?
    Your stupidity astounds me. Do you read all the words in a post, or are you so transfixed with your sad attempt at being correct or need to be called "sir" that you simply cannot comprehend simple English? "In this instance....." means as it applies to this case--the man that went into the home and encountered an active burglary. He was the occupant of the home.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •