Hockey
Basketball
I haven't read all of the posts so I am not sure if someone already made this argument, but I think this is the most compelling argument for hockey.
How many fat old guys do you see playing pick up hockey games (not many. maybe old guys but not fat guys)? How many of those same guys will go out and play pick up basketball (many a fat and or old guy will play pick up basketball)?
*mic drop*
Last edited by PugnacAutMortem; 06-24-2013 at 12:33.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that - George Carlin
Sounds to me like someone didn't get picked for those pickup games on the weekends... Do you even watch hockey, bro?
This is why I didn't even bother bringing Lacrosse into the argument- pretty even matched.
So very true... kinda sad really.
Uh both? Can you clarify which side you're speaking about that doesn't have fat old guys playing? I've played pick up with some pretty old dudes (late 50's- that's pretty old to play on a frozen lake with guys in their early 20's), and I've been to some men's league b-ball games (never played) where there are some old fat guys hustling out on the court- looks like an episode of the Biggest Loser. So what side are you defending?
"There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
"The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."
I guess I wasn't clear enough. You don't see fat guys playing hockey. There's plenty of fat guys playing basketball. Hell, even at a professional level.
And delfuego...not sure what you read or what you assumed about me...but that was an interesting response.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that - George Carlin
FWIW, the old fat guy comments are pretty far off point. Athletic ability has NOTHING to do with how old or fat you are. Physical condition, speed, how long you can go, but actual athletic ability...ZILCH!
Basketball, IMO. While putting a shot in the top shelf over a goalie's glove, or in the five hole requires a LOT of precision and coordination, I think the overall intuition with physics required to maneuver around a defender, jump, judge the distance and stroke needed, then release a shot in basketball outshines it in spades. To say nothing of the visual-physical-auditory coordination needed to dribble through a group of defenders while scanning the rest of the floor and evaluating where, when, and how hard to either pass, or where to then move and restart steps 1-4 all within a fraction of a second for the whole time you've got the ball.
I also consider athleticism to be two-fold. Not only the coordination and cognitive skills, but physical capabilities. Namely: speed, strength, and stamina in the respiratory and muscular systems. It goes without saying that basketball players are faster, more agile, can jump higher, and move with much more dexterity. While hockey players are stronger, they're still inferior against the versatility of a basketball player, IMO. Keep in mind that guys like Lebron, Kobe, and D. Rose are regularly on the floor for 3/4 or more of the game. Even Patrick Kane is getting out on line changes every few minutes.
In short, I must give hockey players their due as top athletes, but I think in terms of pure objective athleticism, basketball players are in a completely different echelon.
Also, for what it's worth, neither of them will ever touch a footballer (real football). Messi, Drogba, Ronaldino, and RVP are gods amongst men.
Last edited by ZERO THEORY; 06-24-2013 at 16:03.