Clayton Cramer, Eugene Volokh, Vanalstyne, Dave Hardy ... we have serious, Supreme Court cited, scholarly historical work supporting our position.
Ignore this fascist twit.
Clayton Cramer, Eugene Volokh, Vanalstyne, Dave Hardy ... we have serious, Supreme Court cited, scholarly historical work supporting our position.
Ignore this fascist twit.
Sayonara
Just because he's one of Uncle Sam's Misguided Children doesn't mean he knows a damn thing about guns, history or law.
Ignore the idiot.
Mick-Boy
"Men who carry rifles for a living do not seek reward outside the guild. The most cherished gift...is a nod from his peers."
nsrconsulting.net
The picture of a Marine PFC on the parade deck in either San Diego or Parris Island just after graduating from boot camp. Either the photo is dated or this isn't a "retired" Marine and someone who has done 20 years of research on the topic.
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?
There are volumes of documents written by the Founders themselves that thoroughly explain what they meant.....and that ain't it.
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
Christopher Dorner was ex military and we all read his bullshit manifesto that included his personal feelings towards the 2A.
Did anyone notice it is an article from CNN?
Ta hell if I'm reading that garbage.
It doesn't matter if you are or have been in the military to be anti-gun, although very low numbers I would think. They do exist. I have had the unlikely pleasure of meeting a dedicated hardcore Marine veteran a long time ago who was very adamantly anit-2a and got in an argument with my father.
The article was not totally anti-gun but not totally pro gun either, he was sitting on the pointy thing at the top of the fence.
Last edited by Skully; 08-07-2013 at 21:35.
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles. --Jeff Cooper"
My feedback