Close
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1. #11
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,789

    Default

    If you're looking for .45 ACP punch in a smaller package, why not go for .40? Muzzle energy is within a couple of percent, the ammo is lighter to carry and easier to find than the GAP, and the variety of guns available is greater. The only downsides I see to .40 are that recoil/report/flash are somewhat sharper due to the higher pressures, and the wound track of an unexpanded bullet is slightly smaller(not an issue with expanding bullets, as most manufacturers show similar expanded diameters for .40 and .45). Don't get me wrong, I love my 1911s, but the .40 makes more sense to me as a CCW round in a compact or subcompact pistol.

  2. #12
    Varmiteer two shoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    705

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iamhunter View Post
    That's my main attraction to it. .45 punch in a 9mm frame.

    I wouldn't need to practice that much with it. Maybe once or twice monthly. I'd use a 21 for practice.

    I'm still pretty tempted by the 30SF though. It'd be nice to have interchangeable clips and ammunition with a 21... but then again if I got the 39 it'd be almost purely for CCW so does it really matter?

    Decisions, decisions.
    Really the only decision is which to get first...
    -two shoes
    _____________________________________________
    The Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is proud to be distributing the greatest amount of free meals and food stamps ever. Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to ‘Please Do Not Feed the Animals'. Their stated reason for the policy is because the animals will grow dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFOGGER View Post
    If you're looking for .45 ACP punch in a smaller package, why not go for .40? Muzzle energy is within a couple of percent, the ammo is lighter to carry and easier to find than the GAP, and the variety of guns available is greater. The only downsides I see to .40 are that recoil/report/flash are somewhat sharper due to the higher pressures, and the wound track of an unexpanded bullet is slightly smaller(not an issue with expanding bullets, as most manufacturers show similar expanded diameters for .40 and .45). Don't get me wrong, I love my 1911s, but the .40 makes more sense to me as a CCW round in a compact or subcompact pistol.
    I've had and shot a number of glock .40SWs and the recoil/report/flash was always a downside. It always just felt a bit more unwieldy to me than 45 ACP.

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by two shoes View Post
    Really the only decision is which to get first...
    i like your style.

  5. #15
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Cedaredgeish
    Posts
    94

    Default

    As an owner of a glock 37 gap (currently listed for sale/trade) I love the capacity and frame work built. Only reason i want rid of mine is my other pistols are all acp. tryin to keep all calibers the same.

    Ammo availability is steadily increasing, Pricey but available.

    If interested we could meet up at a local range or mountain so you can try one out and see if you like or see a difference. Im over due for an ammo expendature anywho.

  6. #16
    Machine Gunner whitewalrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,871

    Default

    I carry glocks in 45 ACP and 40. Never thought about going to a 45 GAP. I would say if you can fit a Glock 30 SF in your hand comfortable, go with that. If its too big for your hand, go with a Glock 23 (40) or go to the 36 (single stack 45acp).

    The performance of the 45GAP is close to 45ACP. However, the ammo is much harder to come by.

  7. #17

    Default

    I have bigger hands so i'm thinking I may just get the glock30sf for now and maybe look at the 39 later down the road as (or if) the caliber increases in popularity.

    I like the idea of a 45 in a 9mm frame but the availability of the ACP and extra capacity seems to be a better value.

  8. #18
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    10mm?
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  9. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sturtle View Post
    10mm?
    Seems to me like all the issues brought up against .45 GAP(availability, pricing)

    apply equally to 10mm

  10. #20
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I thought that might be the case, except I think I might have seen 10mm in a store before, where as I haven't ever seen 45 GAP. Also, I was thinking that 10mm might have more energy than .45ACP.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •