Close
Results 1 to 10 of 132

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner ZERO THEORY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rabid View Post
    can not ban a Black, a Hispanic, a gay, an Indian, an Asian, a Woman, a Man, an Arab, Etc Etc...I think having a gun free zone is unlawful and should be treated the same as discrimination
    I'll play devil's advocate here. I think the idea is that race, gender, and sexual orientation are dynamics that you have 0% control over or decision in being a part of. There's absolutely nothing they can do about it, so to alienate them on the grounds of a fraternity that they have no say in being a member of is faulty.

    The problem with that, of course, is that alienating gun owners who make a choice to legally carry on the grounds of someone else's actions (criminals who aren't of the same fraternity, no less) is no better. It's really stupid deductive reasoning and belittles the competency of adults.

  2. #2
    High Power Shooter Rabid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    967

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZERO THEORY View Post
    I'll play devil's advocate here. I think the idea is that race, gender, and sexual orientation are dynamics that you have 0% control over or decision in being a part of. There's absolutely nothing they can do about it, so to alienate them on the grounds of a fraternity that they have no say in being a member of is faulty.

    The problem with that, of course, is that alienating gun owners who make a choice to legally carry on the grounds of someone else's actions (criminals who aren't of the same fraternity, no less) is no better. It's really stupid deductive reasoning and belittles the competency of adults.
    Although its not natural, people can change their appearance to look like a different race, people can go from an inny to an outy and visa versa and people can decide to bat for the other team. You can insert religion, political orientation and wealth (when it fits the agenda) in my sentence because i can not discriminate on those grounds either.
    I believe our founding documents made it pretty clear they did not want us discriminating against each other but it seems the human race has difficulties with that. For this reason i believe our self governing system is very important and in turn the free market takes hold. However the current system says you can not deny service for a list of reasons, all touched on in the founders documents, but the list only goes so far. It is not our governments job to decide what rights can and what rights can not be discriminated against by a private business, it needs to be an all or nothing deal.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •