Close
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,951
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    I agree that the whole roughing it in the Mtn's thing would get old very fast, BUT..

    In a long term situation, staying in the cities would becoming more dangerous. As the resources evaporated, people will become more and more desparate. Also consider that without water, heating and refrigeration, hygeine will degrade to unhealthy levels and people, in desperation, will consume food that will make them sick, and diseases WILL seemingly pop up out of nowhere and spread like wildfire.

    If you physically remove yourself from the masses, you give yourself a bit of a barrier from some of those risks. You increase your chances for survival.

    Just something to think about.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  2. #2
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    What do you guys think of just creating space where ever you are? If you shoot at people who come within 500 yards of where you are, how long will it take for people to just stay away? In that kind of situation, do you think people would be more likely to try and fight you or just go some where else?
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  3. #3
    Death Eater Troublco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    KFSU (Ft. Sumner, NM)
    Posts
    4,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theGinsue View Post
    I agree that the whole roughing it in the Mtn's thing would get old very fast, BUT..

    In a long term situation, staying in the cities would becoming more dangerous. As the resources evaporated, people will become more and more desparate. Also consider that without water, heating and refrigeration, hygeine will degrade to unhealthy levels and people, in desperation, will consume food that will make them sick, and diseases WILL seemingly pop up out of nowhere and spread like wildfire.

    If you physically remove yourself from the masses, you give yourself a bit of a barrier from some of those risks. You increase your chances for survival.

    Just something to think about.
    I agree with this; no matter how well prepared you are once some of the less fortunates figure out that you have supplies, they and more of their ilk will come. And even if you have plenty of ammo, you have to sleep sometime. As we proved with the Sherman tank in WWII, quantity has a quality all its own. If enough unfortunates are trying for you, eventually they'll get you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
    What do you guys think of just creating space where ever you are? If you shoot at people who come within 500 yards of where you are, how long will it take for people to just stay away? In that kind of situation, do you think people would be more likely to try and fight you or just go some where else?
    Same as what I said above. If you shoot anyone that comes within 500 yards, you're advertising that you have something worth protecting and they'll come. And you have to sleep sometime. I'd rather use distance and stealth than trying to whack every nutjob that came trying for me.
    SI VIS PACEM, PARA BELLUM

    Herding cats and favoring center

  4. #4
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,951
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
    What do you guys think of just creating space where ever you are? If you shoot at people who come within 500 yards of where you are, how long will it take for people to just stay away?
    Quote Originally Posted by Troublco View Post
    I'd rather use distance and stealth than trying to whack every nutjob that came trying for me.
    Where I'm at right now is a tight fitting residential area (I have a whopping 6k sq ft lot). With so many homes for others to hide in/around, my ability to watch around me is limited. PLUS, bullets will go through my walls. If the bad guys (BG's) want to get to me all they have to do is randomly shoot into my home. Eventually they'll get me. Even if they didn't take that approach, as Troublco said ""You've got to sleep some time".

    I still say that in longer term scenarios, my best choice is distance and dissappear.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  5. #5
    AP-4Guy
    Guest

    Default

    I agree, although I didn't say it in my first post, that staying in the city is not a long-term solution. Quite the contrary!! I think the city would become untenable in fairly short order, probably 1-2 weeks max without food, even sooner without water. So, we're on the right track here.

    What I was trying to get across is that in order to survive, even in the mountains or plains, you're going to need food and water. Lots of it. We each have the ability to start accumulating food and a way to get water NOW, not wait for TS to HTF and then you're all of a sudden on the street with your rifle and backpack. Come up with a plan!! And you'll need to be in a place that is defensible if it comes to that. Do I think it is smart to shoot at people just because they wander to within 500 yards of your stuff? No, not unless it's your property or you have unmistakeable markers out showing people where NOT to go. As was pointed out, this also attracts attention, and will surely invite harsh retaliation. I think a more sound plan is in order here.

    I believe most people on the front range, when faced with a crises, will head to the mountains. You know how bad the mountains get on ski weekends, so just imagine if there is a crises brewing in Denver. Yes, initially those people will be confined to the roads and major highways, but it will not be long until the hills will literally be crawling with people. Just something to think about.

  6. #6
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    In a real situation where people are fending for themselves, the only way to determine whose property something is by force.

    I like the rings of preparation idea by the way. Great method to keep focused. I've camped all of two times in my life and generally have no idea what I'm doing so I grossly over pack and bring all kinds of random shit that I never end up needing. Like I'll bring shoelaces or something, with no real purpose in mind, just "in case." Having a plan, to make your plan, helps keep things simple and prevents you from pushing around a shopping cart full of the contents of your junk drawer.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  7. #7
    AP-4Guy
    Guest

    Default

    Stuart,

    Not that I don't think this may be necessary under certain circumstances. But I am just wondering - will this be your property you are defending, or are you just planning on taking someone else's?? And what exactly is the threat these people are presenting to you?

    This sounds like an extension of the "I have a gun, therefore I can get what I need" approach. I'm really not criticizing you, but as you progress I think you will understand how shortsighted and unrealistic this is. Again, this is exactly the situation we can easily avoid with a little forethought and preparation.

    I can relate to the shoelaces syndrome! It's very easy to do. One thing I found helpful was the "List of Lists" on http://www.survivalblog.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •