I just experienced a similar situation in building my second AR. After installing the hammer and moving the hammer back with my thumb, I found that it makes a significant contact with the disconnector 'beak' before continuing back and locked. My first build just barely brushed the 'beak' before locking the hammer back. I did have another new LPK (also from PSA) for spare parts. I swapped out the hammer and now its like the first one...much smoother. The first one must have been misdimensioned?
I'm hoping the lesser contact with the disconnector 'beak' is the proper operation... As now I'm not certain which is the preferable operation/engagement.
You need a touch more engagement than than just brushing the beak. You want to err on the conservative side, you can run into a doubling situation especially if you are trying to feather the trigger.
With the trigger depressed you want AT LEAST a 1/16" and preferably a decent bit more disconnector engagement.
The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...
Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...
My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.
Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.
Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?
Pati, improbe et vince
What kind of a mess is the one on the left? Can you post a side shot?
The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...
Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...
I see you running, tell me what your running from
Nobody's coming, what ya do that was so wrong.
The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...
Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...