Corrupt Establishment GOP is Crony Capitalism's Bought and Paid for Political Arm

[GilpinGuy]

And the troll grows fatter...keep feeding it.

[Great-Kazoo]

And the troll grows fatter...keep feeding it.

[Cujo0920]

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2014/06...-for-survival/

Export-Import bank shaping up as another battle between crony-capitalist RINOS (aligned with Obama, naturally) and genuine Republicans who are fed up with taxpayer subsidies of private banking interests.

[Irving]

Cujo, try writing one of your posts without all of the catch-phrases every other line.

Anyway, I was surprised to see Beuperez won the GOP nomination tonight. The news reported that the "Tea Party Activist Kopp lost." Seemed inappropriate.

[Great-Kazoo]

Cujo, try writing one of your posts without all of the catch-phrases every other line.

Anyway, I was surprised to see Beuperez won the GOP nomination tonight. The news reported that the "Tea Party Activist Kopp lost." Seemed inappropriate.

He's C&P everything but actual Colorado politics.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Bennet is an Obama plant. Warner is also a Democrat albeit from the Clinton wing of the party. Much as I dislike what Mitch McConnell has done (or hasn't done), why the hell would you blame the GOP for Warner and Bennet? As bad as McCain has been, do you honestly think he or Romney would have appointed Eric Holder to AG or anticonstitutional idiots like Sotomayor and Kagan? As much as people dislike the Bushes, remember the first Bush appointed Clarence Thomas and the second Bush appointed Samuel Alito.

Try to get some facts and learn some logical reasoning before you post more uniformed illogical diatribes.

[Cujo0920]

Bennet is an Obama plant. Warner is also a Democrat albeit from the Clinton wing of the party. Much as I dislike what Mitch McConnell has done (or hasn't done), why the hell would you blame the GOP for Warner and Bennet? As bad as McCain has been, do you honestly think he or Romney would have appointed Eric Holder to AG or anticonstitutional idiots like Sotomayor and Kagan? As much as people dislike the Bushes, remember the first Bush appointed Clarence Thomas and the second Bush appointed Samuel Alito.

Try to get some facts and learn some logical reasoning before you post more uniformed illogical diatribes.

You completely missed the point. At the apex of politics, distinctions like "Republican" and "Democrat" are mostly irrelevant. What is relevant is that the movers and shakers in both parties are on the make and on the take. They have the same big donors and reap the rewards of pimping out their votes (on legislation written almost exclusively by lobbyists for corporate or Wall Street interests). They have no true principles or convictions, just greed and ambition for power. Once Cantor leaves "public service" he, like the Clintons, Warner, and Bennet, will go to work for the same banking or corporate interests whose agendas he advanced while he was in office - only they can pay him more directly for services rendered while he was supposedly representing his constituents.

Bill Clinton gets $200K a speech. Hillary got a $14 MILLION advance on her shitty stinker of a book (that's already on the discount rack).

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/26/us...week.html?_r=0

Really? I mean, WTF. Who's paying those fees? And what did they get in return? This is what crony capitalism looks like up close and personal. And we get the bill. Even the media (in the UK and Europe, not our corporate-owned propaganda outlets) are calling Hillary out on her BS:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...al-wealth.html

I don't "blame" the GOP for Warner, Bennet, and the other corrupt Dems. I EXPECT sleaze and corruption from Dems - that's who they are and what they do. Expecting them to refrain from being pigmen would be like asking my dog not to lick his balls. I do blame voters, regardless of affiliation, who install or maintain in office politicians of either party who are for sale to the highest bidder, or who tolerate corruption in "our guy" because he's marginally less sleazy than "their guy."

More from the Republicrat kabuki theater:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-0...hner-sue-obama

Now that Eric Cantor is history, crushed by an unexpected Tea Party "David" (literally and metaphorically) as the US population finally begins to say no to an artifical "two-party" system which is quite united in only serving its Wall Street masters, it is time for that other republican, none other than the consummate folding lawn chair John Boehner, to scramble fearing for his own political career. And since the only way the GOP knows to challenge the implosion of the US republic is by making loud noises and providing hours of hollow theatrical entertainment, here comes Boehner with the biggest soap opera he could muster: moments ago the speaker announced he plans to sue Obama "on behalf of the House over his frequent use of executive actions that Republicans believe are beyond his authority."

[Cujo0920]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014...carry-cochran/

Establishment RINO Cochran relied on Dem voters to secure his victory overTea Party challenger. Go figure.

[Ronin13]

"Republican" and "Democrat" are mostly irrelevant

If what you say is true, then there should be no deadlock in congress and anything can get passed without debate....
Which leads me to believe:

[Cujo0920]

Nice use of selective editing, Ronin13. My full quote was: "At the apex of politics, distinctions like 'Republican' and 'Democrat' are mostly irrelevant." Sorry, I shouldn't use big words like "apex" that cause you to furrow your uni-brow.

Grassroots Republicans, who tend to be conservative, and establishment GOP "leaders" (who couldn't lead ants to a picnic) are two very different animals. As far as debate or deadlock in Congress, did that stop abominations like Obamacare or Wall Street bailouts or endless debt ceiling increases from being rammed up our collective asses? I'm guessing you're not a taxpayer - you seem to be a pretty airtight case for "at-risk adult" disability payments - but rhetoric aside, there's not much difference between the RINOS who dominate the top echelons of the establishment GOP, and their DNC opposite numbers.