Close
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock, Colorado
    Posts
    728

    Default

    http://joelrussman.com/blog/colorado...na-businesses/

    Judge Charles M Pratt sounds like one of the few keepers. Basically told some weed dealers who had a conflict to pound sand and get out of his court. Cited the fact that it is against fed law to sell weed. Seems he is the only person that cares that it is against fed law.

  2. #22
    Machine Gunner Goodburbon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Cotopaxi, CO
    Posts
    1,434

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KAPA View Post
    http://joelrussman.com/blog/colorado...na-businesses/

    Judge Charles M Pratt sounds like one of the few keepers. Basically told some weed dealers who had a conflict to pound sand and get out of his court. Cited the fact that it is against fed law to sell weed. Seems he is the only person that cares that it is against fed law.
    Yeah...um, I think that's crap, he's not a federal judge.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
    The people lived in fear of reprisal from their leaders, children cried themselves to sleep, all hope was lost... and then there was a whale.

    www.bugoutwhale.com

  3. #23
    Machine Gunner Jeffrey Lebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    1,615

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Goodburbon View Post
    I went by who appointed them. If it was a Dem, they got a no regardless of party affiliation.
    This is what I did as well.
    Obviously not a golfer.

  4. #24
    High Power Shooter SamuraiCO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    869

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffrey Lebowski View Post
    This is what I did as well.
    Used clearthebenchcolorado for supreme and appeals court. Then looked at who appointed. If Dem Gov appointed, no. If Repub appointed, yes.
    Armageddon was yesterday, today we have a real problem.

    Despite what your momma told you violence does solve problems-The Craft

  5. #25
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    I voted them all out, especially the district judges put in by either Hick or Owens. Judgepedia is a good resource to find out some info on judges, but I find that a lot of the information I really want (political affiliations, stance on gun control, voting history, etc) is very lacking.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  6. #26
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,556

    Default

    I voted to keep some of them in based on the evaluations linked at Clear the Bench Colorado (which I linked above). Judges can't help who appoints them and even the liberal politicos occasionally put some decent people in place.

    I found it interesting one of the two Colorado SC justices up for retention had a fairly positive evaluation in supporting the Constitution, including voting to keep Ortiz in Pueblo from loading the dice in the recall elections last year.

    Somehow, I don't think the Judicial Review Panel meant for me to use their evaluations as I did. There were a few local judges who seemed to piss off the lawyers but got favorable reviews from non-lawyer observers/trial participants so I was inclined to keep them out of pure orneriness.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •